Alvameline (Lu 25-109)

Features and outcomes of drugs for combination therapy as multi-targets strategy to combat Alzheimer's disease

Ethnopharmacological relevance: Alzheimer's disease (AD), a deleterious neurodegenerative disorder that impairs memory, cognitive functions and may lead to dementia in late stage of life. The pathogenic cause of AD remains incompletely understood and FDA approved drugs are partial inhibitors rather than curative. Most of drugs are synthetic or natural products as galanthamine is an alkaloid obtained from Galanthus spp. Huperzine A, an alkaloid found in Huperzia spp., gingkolides a diterpenoids from Gingko biloba and many ethnobotanicals like Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal., Physostigma venenosum Balf., Bacopa monnieri (L.) Wettst., Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. have been used by traditional Indian, Chinese, and European system of medicines in AD. Clinical significance opioid alkaloid in Papaver somniferum has shown another dimension to this study. Over exploitation of medicinal plants with limited bioactive principles has provided templates to design synthetic drugs in AD e.g. rivastigmine, phenserine, eptastigmine based on chemical structure of physostigmine of Physostigma venenosum Balf. Even ZT-1 a prodrug of Hup A and memogain a prodrug of galantamine has achieved new direction in drug development in AD. All these first-line cholinesterase-inhibitors are used as symptomatic treatments in AD. Single modality of "One-molecule-one-target" strategy for treating AD has failed and so future therapies on "Combination-drugs-multi-targets" strategy (CDMT) will need to address multiple aspects to block the progression of pathogenesis of AD. Besides, cholinergic and amyloid drugs, in this article we summarize proteinopathy-based drugs as AD therapeutics from a variety of biological sources. In this review, an attempt has been made to elucidate the molecular mode of action of various plant products, and synthetic drugs investigated in various preclinical and clinical tests in AD. It also discusses current attempts to formulate a comprehensive CDMT strategy to counter complex pathogenesis in AD. Materials and methods: Information were collected from classical books on medicinal plants, pharmacopoeias and scientific databases like PubMed, Scopus, GoogleScholar, Web of Science and electronic searches were performed using Cochrane Library, Medline and EMBASE. Also published scientific literatures from Elsevier, Taylor and Francis, Springer, ACS, Wiley publishers and reports by government bodies and documentations were assessed. Results: 60 no. of natural and synthetic drugs have been studied with their significant bioactivities. A decision matrix designed for evaluation of drugs for considering to the hypothetic "CDMT" strategy in AD. We have introduced the scoring pattern of individual drugs and based on scoring pattern, drugs that fall within the scoring range of 18-25 are considered in the proposed CDMT. It also highlights the importance of available natural products and in future those drugs may be considered in CDMT along with the qualified synthetic drugs. Conclusion: A successful validation of the CDMT strategy may open up a debate on health care reform to explore other possibilities of combination therapy. In doing so, it should focus on clinical and molecular relationships between AD and CDMT. A better understanding of these relationships could inform and impact future development of AD-directed treatment strategies. This strategy also involves in reducing costs in treatment phases which will be affordable to a common man suffering from AD.

A bridging study of LU 25-109 in patients with probable Alzheimer's disease

Lu 25-109 is a functionally selective partial M1 agonist with M2/M3 antagonist properties. This double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-part, inpatient bridging study was designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of multiple oral doses of Lu 25-109 in patients with Alzheimer's Disease(AD), and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in this population. In the first part of the study, the fixed-dose MTD was to be determined in five consecutive panels of 6 patients each (4 Lu 25-109/2 placebo). Doses for the five panels were 100, 125, 150, 200, and 225 mg tid for 7 days. Cholinergic adverse events such as increased salivation, dizziness, and gastrointestinal symptoms were observed at all doses studied. The dosing of fixed-dose panels was discontinued after 3 days at 200 mg tid due to unacceptable gastrointestinal adverse events. Thus, 150 mg tid was defined as the fixed-dose MTD. The second part of the study, conducted in a single panel of 8 patients (6 Lu 25-109/2 placebo), was designed to determine if patients could tolerate higher doses of Lu 25-109 when administered on a titration regimen. Patients were to receive doses that were 50%, 75%, 100%, 125%, and 150% of the fixed dose MTD, with dose increases every five days. The first dose, 75 mg tid, was very well-tolerated; however, as in the first phase of the study, patients did not tolerate the 200 mg tid dose. Thus, the titration regimen employed did not improve the overall tolerability of Lu 25-109.

Actions of the new antimuscarinic compound Lu 25-109 on isolated human and pig detrusor

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a novel antimuscarinic agent, Lu 25-109, a partial M1 receptor agonist, and M2/M3 receptor antagonist in human and pig detrusor to establish its affinity for muscarinic receptors in human detrusor and parotid gland and to compare the results with those obtained with oxybutynin. Effects on the detrusor were determined as regards the ability to inhibit carbachol-induced contractions and contractions induced by electrical field stimulation (EFS). Radioligand binding studies were performed to assess the ability to displace quinuclidinyl benzilate (3H-QNB) from muscarinic receptors in the detrusor and parotid gland. Lu 25-109 produced a concentration-dependent rightward shift of the concentration-response curves for carbachol in both human and pig detrusor, the pK(b) values being 6.2+/-0.1 (n=6) and 5.8+/-0.3 (n=6). Corresponding values for oxybutynin were 7.9+/-0.1 (n=7) and 7.8+/-0.1 (n=6). Contractions induced by EFS in human detrusor were almost completely inhibited by 100 micromol/L Lu 25-109 (84+/-4%; n=4). In contrast, EFS-induced contractions in pig detrusor were less sensitive to Lu 25-109, resulting in a final inhibition of 32+/-6% (n=9) with the highest concentration used (100 micromol/L). This difference in effect between human and pig detrusor was not observed with oxybutynin. Radioligand binding experiments demonstrated a small difference in affinity for Lu 25-109 in the parotid gland compared with the bladder, the pKi values being 6.2+/-0.1 versus 6.5+/-0.1 (n=4). Corresponding values for oxybutynin were 8.5+/-0.1 versus 8.2+/-0.1 (n=4). The results show that Lu 25-109 competitively and effectively antagonizes carbachol-induced contractions and contractions induced by EFS in human detrusor muscle. Even if Lu 25-109 were less potent than oxybutynin, it has an effect profile that makes it of interest to test its ability to counteract bladder overactivity in humans.

In vivo muscarinic cholinergic mediated effects of Lu 25-109, a M1 agonist and M2/M3 antagonist in vitro

Lu 25-109 [5-(2-ethyl-2H-tetrazol-5-yl)-1,2,3,6-tetrahydro-1-methylpyridine] , has M agonistic and M2/M3 antagonistic effects at muscarinic receptors in vitro; a pharmacological profile that may be beneficial in treatment of Alzheimer's disease. In the present study, we compare functional in vivo effects of Lu 25-109 and reference compounds in animal models of muscarinic cholinergic function. Lu 25-109 substituted completely for the discriminative stimulus effects of (-)-7-methyl-3-(2-propynyloxy)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisothiazolo -[4, 5-c]pyridine (Lu 26-046), a partial M1/M2 agonist, but only weakly for the effects of the non-selective M1/M2/M3 agonist 3-methoxy-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-isoxazolo[4, 5-c] pyridine (O-Me-THPO). Lu 25-109 did not reverse O-Me-THPO-induced discriminative stimulus. Tacrine did not substitute for any of the training drugs. Lu 25-109 did not substitute in (-)-nicotine trained rats. Lu 25-109 did not antagonize oxotremorine-induced hypothermia, tremor and salivation in mice and antagonized physostigmine-induced lethality with low potency. Unlike non-selective muscarinic agonists and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, Lu 25-109 did not induce hypothermia, tremor or salivation in mice. Spontaneous locomotor activity and motor co-ordination were inhibited only at high doses. Lu 25-109 had no effect on mean blood pressure in anaesthetized rats. Lu 25-109 and O-Me-THPO produced a significant increase in heart rate. The maximum increase was 37%. In anaesthetized cats, increasing i.v. doses of Lu 25-109 were without effect on the mean blood pressure, except for a short lasting (<2 min) depressor effect following the IV injection. Furthermore, Lu 25-109 did not attenuate the reflex mechanisms restoring blood pressure following orthostasis in cats. In conclusion, the drug discrimination studies suggest a unique activity profile of Lu 25-109, and the in vivo profile suggests none or a very low frequency of unwanted cholinergic mediated effects.

Lu 25-109, a combined m1 agonist and m2 antagonist, modulates regulated processing of the amyloid precursor protein of Alzheimer's disease

To examine the effects of the combined muscarinic ml-agonist/m2-antagonist Lu 25-109 on regulated processing of the amyloid protein precursor (APP), we used both transfected cells expressing human muscarinic m1 or m2 acetylcholine receptors, and fresh rat hippocampal slices. Lu 25-109 readily stimulated APPs secretion from HEK 293 cells overexpressing m1, but not m2, receptors, as well as from the hippocampal brain slices. Time-course analyses revealed a rapid (5-35 minutes), and a delayed (55-75 minutes) secretory response to Lu 25-109 with distinct concentration profiles suggesting two distinct cell biological mechanisms. Both responses appeared to reflect post-translational mechanisms because levels of APP message were unchanged after 60 minutes of stimulation with Lu 25-109. In comparison to carbachol, Lu 25-109 had a significantly lower intrinsic activity at muscarinic m1 receptors, compatible with a pharmacological profile as a partial agonist at recombinantly expressed m1 receptors. In as much as stimulation of APPs secretion is associated with reduced formation of A beta peptides, Lu 25-109 may be useful to reduce A beta generation, and thus, slow amyloid plaque formation. Moreover, Lu 25-109 may be useful in promoting the known neurotrophic and neuroprotective biological functions of secreted APPs.