Chiglitazar
(Synonyms: Carfloglitazar) 目录号 : GC31552
Chiglitazar是泛过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体(PPARα/γ)的双抑制剂，其对PPARα，PPARγ和PPARδ的EC50值分别为1.2，0.08和1.7μM。
Cas No.:743438-45-1
Sample solution is provided at 25 µL, 10mM.
;)
,-1-7$$$37316672.jpg');)
;)
;)
$$$36806353.jpg');)
;33(7)%EF%BC%9A546-561$$$37156877.jpg');)
;)
;)
;)
%201124-1138.$$$35908550.jpg');)
%20766-780.$$$37100057.jpg');)
%20418-432.$$$36893736.jpg');)
%EF%BC%9A-240-255.$$$35108512.jpg');)
533-545$$$36543525.jpg');)
%201-13.$$$36600053.jpg');)
;)
Quality Control & SDS
- View current batch:
- Purity: >96.00%
- COA (Certificate Of Analysis)
- SDS (Safety Data Sheet)
- Datasheet
|
Animal experiment: |
Rats[1]MSG obese rats (6 months old) are sorted into five treatment groups (n=10 each, male and female in half) based on decreased blood glucose in the insulin tolerance test, glucose levels, blood total triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TCHO), and initial body weight. From the next day, MSG obese rats receive single daily oral treatment with Chiglitazar (5, 10, and 20 mg kg-1 day-1, respectively), rosiglitazone (5 mg kg-1 day-1) or vehicle (water, 0.05% Tween 80) for 40 days. Normal wistar rats (n=10) serve as a normal group are treated with vehicle[1]. |
|
References: [1]. Li PP, et al. The PPARalpha/gamma dual agonist chiglitazar improves insulin resistance and dyslipidemia in MSG obese rats. Br J Pharmacol. 2006 Jul;148(5):610-8. |
|
Chiglitazar is a PPARα/γ dual agonist, with EC50s of 1.2, 0.08, 1.7 μM for PPARα, PPARγ and PPARδ, respectively.
Comparative dose-response study of Chiglitazar is performed with rosiglitazone and pioglitazone for PPARγ, and WY14643 for PPARα. Chiglitazar shows significant activation of both the isoforms. Chiglitazar shows weaker PPARγ activating activity than rosiglitazone, but stronger than pioglitazone. In terms of PPARα activation, Chiglitazar shows more potent activity than rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, or WY14643 which is a selective PPARα agonist[1].
After insulin injection, plasma glucose levels in the MSG rats treated with Chiglitazar or rosiglitazone are significantly reduced compared with the control group treated with vehicle at all time points. Fasting PI levels are lower in animals treated with Chiglitazar and rosiglitazone than control. The ISIs of MSG obese rats treated with chiglitazar and rosiglitazone are significantly higher than control. Furthermore, Chiglitazar ameliorates the HOMA indices. For IPGTT, at the 30 min after glucose loading, the glucose values in the 5 and 10 mg /kg Chiglitazar and rosiglitazone-treatment groups are significantly lower than those in the vehicle treatment group. The integrated for the glucose response during the IPGTT in the treatment groups are significantly less than those in the control groups[1].
[1]. Li PP, et al. The PPARalpha/gamma dual agonist chiglitazar improves insulin resistance and dyslipidemia in MSG obese rats. Br J Pharmacol. 2006 Jul;148(5):610-8. [2]. He BK, et al. In Vitro and In Vivo Characterizations of Chiglitazar, a Newly Identified PPAR Pan-Agonist. PPAR Res. 2012;2012:546548.
| Cas No. | 743438-45-1 | SDF | |
| 别名 | Carfloglitazar | ||
| Canonical SMILES | O=C(C1=CC=C(F)C=C1)C(C=CC=C2)=C2N[C@H](C(O)=O)CC(C=C3)=CC=C3OCCN4C5=CC=CC=C5C6=CC=CC=C46 | ||
| 分子式 | C36H29FN2O4 | 分子量 | 572.62 |
| 溶解度 | DMSO : 100 mg/mL (174.64 mM; Need ultrasonic) | 储存条件 | Store at -20°C,protect from light |
| General tips | 请根据产品在不同溶剂中的溶解度选择合适的溶剂配制储备液；一旦配成溶液，请分装保存，避免反复冻融造成的产品失效。 储备液的保存方式和期限：-80°C 储存时，请在 6 个月内使用，-20°C 储存时，请在 1 个月内使用。 为了提高溶解度，请将管子加热至37℃，然后在超声波浴中震荡一段时间。 |
||
| Shipping Condition | 评估样品解决方案：配备蓝冰进行发货。所有其他可用尺寸：配备RT，或根据请求配备蓝冰。 | ||
| 制备储备液 | |||
 |
1 mg | 5 mg | 10 mg |
| 1 mM | 1.7464 mL | 8.7318 mL | 17.4636 mL |
| 5 mM | 0.3493 mL | 1.7464 mL | 3.4927 mL |
| 10 mM | 0.1746 mL | 0.8732 mL | 1.7464 mL |
| 第一步：请输入基本实验信息（考虑到实验过程中的损耗，建议多配一只动物的药量） | ||||||||||
| 给药剂量 | mg/kg |  |
动物平均体重 | g | |
每只动物给药体积 | ul | |
动物数量 | 只 |
| 第二步：请输入动物体内配方组成（配方适用于不溶于水的药物；不同批次药物配方比例不同，请联系GLPBIO为您提供正确的澄清溶液配方） | ||||||||||
| % DMSO % % Tween 80 % saline | ||||||||||
| 计算重置 | ||||||||||
计算结果:
工作液浓度： mg/ml；
DMSO母液配制方法： mg 药物溶于 μL DMSO溶液（母液浓度 mg/mL，
体内配方配制方法：取 μL DMSO母液，加入 μL PEG300，混匀澄清后加入μL Tween 80，混匀澄清后加入 μL saline，混匀澄清。
1. 首先保证母液是澄清的；
2.
一定要按照顺序依次将溶剂加入，进行下一步操作之前必须保证上一步操作得到的是澄清的溶液，可采用涡旋、超声或水浴加热等物理方法助溶。
3. 以上所有助溶剂都可在 GlpBio 网站选购。
Chiglitazar: First Approval
Chiglitazar (Bilessglu?) is an orally administered, non-thiazolidinedione small-molecule agonist of 汐, 汛 and 污 peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) being developed by Chipscreen Biosciences for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. In October 2021, chiglitazar was approved in China for use as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycaemic control in adult patients with T2D. The drug is also in phase 2 clinical development in China for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of chiglitazar leading to this first approval for the treatment of T2D.
Chiglitazar: a novel pan-PPAR agonist
Chiglitazar monotherapy with sitagliptin as an active comparator in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial (CMAS)
Chiglitazar (Carfloglitazar) is a novel peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) pan-agonist that has shown promising effects on glycemic control and lipid regulation in patients with type 2 diabetes. In this randomized phase 3 trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of chiglitazar with sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes who had insufficient glycemic control despite a strict diet and exercise regimen. Eligible patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive chiglitazar 32 mg (n = 245), chiglitazar 48 mg (n = 246), or sitagliptin 100 mg (n = 248) once daily for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in glycosylated hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) from baseline at week 24 with the non-inferiority of chiglitazar over sitagliptin. Both chiglitazar and sitagliptin significantly reduced HbA1c at week 24 with values of -1.40%, -1.47%, and -1.39% for chiglitazar 32 mg, chiglitazar 48 mg, and sitagliptin 100 mg, respectively. Chiglitazar 32 and 48 mg were both non-inferior to sitagliptin 100 mg, with mean differences of -0.04% (95% confidential interval (CI) -0.22 to 0.15) and -0.08% (95% CI -0.27 to 0.10), respectively. Compared with sitagliptin, greater reduction in fasting and 2-h postprandial plasma glucose and fasting insulin was observed with chiglitazar. Overall adverse event rates were similar between the groups. A small increase in mild edema in the chiglitazar 48 mg group and slight weight gain in both chiglitazar groups were reported. The overall results demonstrated that chiglitazar possesses good efficacy and safety profile in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with lifestyle interventions, thereby providing adequate supporting evidence for using this PPAR pan-agonist as a treatment option for type 2 diabetes.
Comparative Evaluation of Chiglitazar and Sitagliptin on the Levels of Retinol-Binding Protein 4 and Its Correlation With Insulin Resistance in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
Aims: We evaluated the efficacy and significant changes in the levels of retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP-4) and insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with chiglitazar versus sitagliptin.
Methods: Eighty-one T2DM patients with haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of 7.5%-10.0% were selected. Based on the study criteria, patients were randomly assigned to receive chiglitazar (32 mg), chiglitazar (48 mg), or sitagliptin (100 mg) orally for 24 weeks. Sociodemographic and anthropometric characteristics, lipid profiles, glucose profiles, and serum RBP-4 levels were determined at baseline and at the end of the therapy.
Results: After treatment for 24 weeks, significant changes in fasting blood glucose (FBG), fasting insulin (Fins), 2 h-blood glucose (2h-BG), the score values of insulin resistance/insulin secretion/汕 cell function (HOMA-IR, HOMA-IS, and HOMA-汕), triglyceride (TG), free fatty acid (FFA), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and RBP-4 levels were detected in patients with chiglitazar administration and sitagliptin administration. Changes in RBP-4 levels were positively correlated with changes in HOMA-IR and 2 h-BG in linear regression.
Conclusions: Chiglitazar showed a greater improvement in parameters of diabetes than sitagliptin, and changes in serum RBP-4 levels were associated with changes in insulin-sensitizing parameters.
Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, CT.gov identifier: NCT02173457.
Effect of chiglitazar and sitagliptin on glucose variations, insulin resistance and inflammatory-related biomarkers in untreated patients with type 2 diabetes
Aims: To evaluate glycemic variations, changes in insulin resistance and oxidative stress after chiglitazar or sitagliptin treatment in untreated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
Methods: Based on the study inclusion and exclusion criteria, 81 patients with T2DM were randomly divided to receive chiglitazar or sitagliptin treatment for 24 weeks. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems were conducted for 72 h in eligible patients. We analyzed the following glycemic variation parameters derived from the CGM data and measured the serum levels of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose (FBG), 2-h postprandial blood glucose (2-h PBG), fasting insulin (Fins) and inflammatory-related indicators at baseline and the end of the study.
Results: After treatment for 24 weeks, our data showed a similar reduction in HbA1c between chiglitazar and sitagliptin. The 24-h mean blood glucose (MBG), standard deviation (SD) and mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE) were significantly decreased, and the time in range (TIR) was increased after chiglitazar and sitagliptin therapy. Chiglitazar administration led to significant improvement in insulin resistance/insulin secretion (HOMA-IR, HOMA-IS), interleukin-6 (IL-6), prostaglandin F2汐 (PGF-2汐), 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP) and adiponectin (ADP) score values compared with sitagliptin administration.
Conclusions: Chiglitazar therapy effectively reduced glucose variation and showed a larger improvement in insulin resistance and inflammatory parameters than sitagliptin.