Home>>Signaling Pathways>> Tyrosine Kinase>> ROS>>Ensulizole

Ensulizole Sale

(Synonyms: 苯基苯丙咪唑磺酸) 目录号 : GC38776

Ensulizole (PBSA), a water soluble sunscreen ingredient, is a sulfonated UV absorber which is characterized by intense UVB and partial UVA absorption. Ensulizole can damage the DNA through the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) upon UV or sunlight irradiation.

Ensulizole Chemical Structure

Cas No.:27503-81-7

规格 价格 库存 购买数量
Free Sample (0.1-0.5 mg) 待询 待询
10mM (in 1mL DMSO)
¥495.00
现货
100mg
¥450.00
现货
250mg
¥900.00
现货
500mg
¥1,530.00
现货
1g 待询 待询
5g 待询 待询

电话:400-920-5774 Email: sales@glpbio.cn

Customer Reviews

Based on customer reviews.

Sample solution is provided at 25 µL, 10mM.

产品文档

Quality Control & SDS

View current batch:

产品描述

Ensulizole (PBSA), a water soluble sunscreen ingredient, is a sulfonated UV absorber which is characterized by intense UVB and partial UVA absorption. Ensulizole can damage the DNA through the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) upon UV or sunlight irradiation.

Ensulizole selectively inhibits activity of HDAC3.[2]

[1] Wael H M Abdelraheem, et al. J Hazard Mater. 2015 Jan 23;282:233-40. [2] Hsu CW, et al. J Biomol Screen. 2016 Jul;21(6):643-52.

Chemical Properties

Cas No. 27503-81-7 SDF
别名 苯基苯丙咪唑磺酸
Canonical SMILES O=S(C1=CC=C2N=C(C3=CC=CC=C3)NC2=C1)(O)=O
分子式 C13H10N2O3S 分子量 274.3
溶解度 0.1 M NaOH: 10 mg/mL (36.46 mM; ultrasonic and adjust pH to 8 with NaOH); DMSO: 8.33 mg/mL (30.37 mM) 储存条件 Store at -20°C
General tips 请根据产品在不同溶剂中的溶解度选择合适的溶剂配制储备液;一旦配成溶液,请分装保存,避免反复冻融造成的产品失效。
储备液的保存方式和期限:-80°C 储存时,请在 6 个月内使用,-20°C 储存时,请在 1 个月内使用。
为了提高溶解度,请将管子加热至37℃,然后在超声波浴中震荡一段时间。
Shipping Condition 评估样品解决方案:配备蓝冰进行发货。所有其他可用尺寸:配备RT,或根据请求配备蓝冰。

溶解性数据

制备储备液
1 mg 5 mg 10 mg
1 mM 3.6456 mL 18.2282 mL 36.4564 mL
5 mM 0.7291 mL 3.6456 mL 7.2913 mL
10 mM 0.3646 mL 1.8228 mL 3.6456 mL
  • 摩尔浓度计算器

  • 稀释计算器

  • 分子量计算器

质量
=
浓度
x
体积
x
分子量
 
 
 
*在配置溶液时,请务必参考产品标签上、MSDS / COA(可在Glpbio的产品页面获得)批次特异的分子量使用本工具。

计算

动物体内配方计算器 (澄清溶液)

第一步:请输入基本实验信息(考虑到实验过程中的损耗,建议多配一只动物的药量)
给药剂量 mg/kg 动物平均体重 g 每只动物给药体积 ul 动物数量
第二步:请输入动物体内配方组成(配方适用于不溶于水的药物;不同批次药物配方比例不同,请联系GLPBIO为您提供正确的澄清溶液配方)
% DMSO % % Tween 80 % saline
计算重置

Research Update

Elucidating the Photoluminescence Quenching in Ensulizole: an Artificial Water Soluble Sunscreen

J Fluoresc 2021 Jul;31(4):1055-1063.PMID:33956267DOI:10.1007/s10895-021-02736-x.

Employing natural or artificial sunscreens is essential to protect the skin from ultraviolet radiations that cause premature aging and develop melanoma and other forms of skin cancer. The 2-Phenylbenzimidazole-5-sulfonic acid, commonly known as Ensulizole is a water-soluble artificial sunscreen that absorb UV-B (280 nm - 315 nm) radiations and protects the skin against the harmful effects of these radiations. We have measured steady-state photoluminescence (SSPL) spectra and photoluminescence (PL) kinetics of this compound in various conditions. Steady-state absorption indicates a strong absorption feature at 303 nm and a weak one at 316 nm that have been identified as π → π* and n → π* transitions, respectively. The spectra of PL induced by these absorptions indicate that the PL of Ensulizole is less Stokes-shifted in polar solvents and more Stokes-shifted in non-polar solvents. The average PL lifetime of Ensulizole is longer in non-polar solvents than in polar solvents and it exhibits the shortest PL lifetime in aqueous medium that maximize its transition efficiency in water. This suggests in non-polar solvents intersystem crossing is the dominant mode of relaxation of the excited ππ* state. Furthermore, an increase of pH of Ensulizole solution decreases the PL intensity and the lifetime. Stern-Volmer equation is employed to evaluate bimolecular quenching rate constant kq. The evaluation result suggests the diffusional dynamic mode of PL quenching is operative.

Gone with sunscreens: Responses of blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) to a wide concentration range of a UV filter Ensulizole

Chemosphere 2022 Dec;309(Pt 1):136736.PMID:36209850DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136736.

Organic UV filters have emerged as a new threat to marine organisms, but ecotoxicological studies have so far focused on only a few substances despite the chemical diversity of these synthetic sunscreen agents. Here we examined the responses of blue mussels Mytilus edulis to Ensulizole, a non-lipophilic UV filter commonly found in the Baltic Sea. Mussels were exposed for three weeks to five Ensulizole concentrations of 10, 102, 103, 104, and 105 ng/L. Stress on stress response was evaluated by subjecting mussels to air exposure. A battery of biomarkers related to detoxification and antioxidant defense, oxidative stress damage, energy reserves and metabolism, autophagy, apoptosis, inflammation, and DNA damage was measured in the gills and the digestive gland. In general, Ensulizole affected the antioxidant response, energy storage, and cell death-related processes in mussel tissues. Mussels exposed to low, environmentally relevant concentrations of Ensulizole had a shorter air survival time than the control. Ensulizole often showed the non-monotonic concentration-response curves, suggesting the complex effects of this UV filter at molecular, biochemical, and organismal levels.

Biomarker-based assessment of sublethal toxicity of organic UV filters (Ensulizole and octocrylene) in a sentinel marine bivalve Mytilus edulis

Sci Total Environ 2021 Dec 1;798:149171.PMID:34329935DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149171.

The global occurrence of organic UV filters in the marine environment is of increasing ecotoxicological concern. Here we assessed the toxicity of UV filters Ensulizole and octocrylene in the blue mussels Mytilus edulis exposed to 10 or 100 μg l-1 of octocrylene and Ensulizole for two weeks. An integrated battery of biochemical and molecular biomarkers related to xenobiotics metabolism and cellular toxicity (including oxidative stress, DNA damage, apoptosis, autophagy and inflammation) was used to assess the toxicity of these UV filters in the mussels. Octocrylene (but not Ensulizole) accumulated in the mussel tissues during the waterborne exposures. Both studied UV filters induced sublethal toxic effects in M. edulis at the investigated concentrations. These effects involved induction of oxidative stress, genotoxicity (indicated by upregulation of DNA damage sensing and repair markers), upregulation of apoptosis and inflammation, and dysregulation of the xenobiotic biotransformation system. Octocrylene induced cellular stress in a concentration-dependent manner, whereas Ensulizole appeared to be more toxic at the lower (10 μg l-1) studied concentration than at 100 μg l-1. The different concentration-dependence of sublethal effects and distinct toxicological profiles of Ensulizole and octocrylene show that the environmental toxicity is not directly related to lipophilicity and bioaccumulation potential of these UV filters and demonstrate the importance of using bioassays for toxicity assessment of emerging pollutants in coastal marine ecosystems.

Photosynthetic performance of symbiont-bearing foraminifera Heterostegina depressa affected by sunscreens

Sci Rep 2022 Feb 17;12(1):2750.PMID:35177723DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-06735-1.

Foraminifera are abundant unicellular organisms that play an important role in marine element cycles. A large benthic foraminifer obligatory bearing photosymbionts is Heterostegina depressa. We studied potential impacts of sunscreens available on the market on the activity of photosymbionts on H. depressa by means of pulse-amplitude modulated (PAM) fluorescence microscopy. We included four different sunscreens, with two of them sold as "conventional" and two more stated as "eco-friendly". Further, the impact of pure Ensulizole (phenylbenzimidazole sulfonic acid) was tested, which is a common agent of sunscreens. Foraminifera were incubated at varying concentrations (10, 50 and 200 mgL-1) of different sunscreens and the pure Ensulizole for 14 days. The photosynthetic performance was measured after 1,3, 7 and 14 days. Pure Ensulizole had a strong negative impact on the photobionts, which was reflected by a significant reduction of the areal fluorescence signal. "Eco-friendly" sunscreens affected the health of foraminifera more severely compared to "conventional" ones. We assume that metal nanoparticles like titanium dioxide or zinc oxide of "eco-friendly" sunscreens are causing this impact, because these substances were already classified as toxic for several microorganisms.

Simultaneous analysis and monitoring of 16 UV filters in cosmetics by high-performance liquid chromatography

J Cosmet Sci 2012 Mar-Apr;63(2):103-17.PMID:22591562doi

Sixteen UV filters were simultaneously analyzed using the high-performance liquid chromatographic method. They were drometrizole (USAN Drometrizole), 4-methylbenzylidene camphor (USAN Enzacamene), menthyl anthranilate (USAN Menthyl anthranilate), benzophenone-3 (USAN Oxybenzone), benzophenone-8 (USAN Dioxybenzone), butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane (USAN Avobenzone), ethylhexyl triazone (USAN Octyl triazone), octocrylene (USAN Octocrylene), ethylhexyl dimethyl p-aminobenzoic acid (USAN Padimate O), ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate (USAN Octinoxate), p-aminobenzoic acid (USAN Aminobenzoic acid), 2-phenylbenzimidazole-5-sulfonic acid (USAN Ensulizole), isoamyl p-methoxycinnamate (USAN Amiloxate), and recent UV filters such as diethylhexyl butamidotriazone (USAN Iscotrizinol), methylene bis-benzotriazolyl tetramethylbutylphenol (USAN Bisoctrizole), and terephthalylidene dicamphor sulfonic acid (USAN Ecamsule). Separation of the UV filters was carried out in a C(18) column with a gradient of methanol-phosphate buffer, and the UV detection was at 300, 320, or 360 nm without any interference. The limits of detection were between 0.08 and 1.94 μg/ml, and the limits of quantitation were between 0.24 and 5.89 μg/ml. The extracting solvent for the UV filters was methanol, except for ethylhexyl triazone and methylene bis-benzotriazolyl tetramethylbutylphenol, which were prepared with tetrahydrofuran. The recoveries from spiked samples were between 94.90% and 116.54%, depending on the matrixes used. The developed method was applied to 23 sunscreens obtained from local markets, and the results were acceptable to their own criteria and to maximum authorized concentrations. Consequently, these results would provide a simple extracting method and a simultaneous determination for various UV filters, which can improve the quality control process as well as the environmental monitoring of sunscreens.