Lirimilast
(Synonyms: BAY 19-8004) 目录号 : GC38921Lirimilast (BAY 19-8004) 是一种有效的,选择性的和口服活性的磷酸二酯酶 4 (PDE4) 抑制剂,IC50 值为 49 nM。Lirimilast 可用于治疗哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺疾病 (COPD),具有强效的抗炎特性。
Cas No.:329306-27-6
Sample solution is provided at 25 µL, 10mM.
Quality Control & SDS
- View current batch:
- Purity: >98.00%
- COA (Certificate Of Analysis)
- SDS (Safety Data Sheet)
- Datasheet
Lirimilast (BAY 19-8004) is a potent, selective and orally active phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitor with an IC50 value of 49 nM. Lirimilast can be used for the treatment of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Lirimilast has potently anti-inflammatory properties[1][2].
In PDE4 assays Lirimilast (BAY 19-8004) is reported to be 5-fold more potent than Cilomilast and equipotent with CDP-840 using freshly prepared PDE4 from human PMNL[1].
Since Lirimilast (BAY 19-8004) is orally active in the guinea-pig at 3 mg/kg and, more critically, in primates at 0.1 mg/kg/day it appears to have a good therapeutic ratio. In addition Lirimilast is found to be 3-fold more potent than Cilomilast when compared in a rat model of lung neutrophilic inflammation[2].
[1]. Grootendorst DC, et al. Efficacy of the novel phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor BAY 19-8004 on lung function and airway inflammation in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2003;16(6):341-7. [2]. Peter Norman. PDE4 inhibitors: sustained patenting activity as leading drugs near the market. Exp. Opin. Ther. Patents (2000) 10(9):1415-1427.
Cas No. | 329306-27-6 | SDF | |
别名 | BAY 19-8004 | ||
Canonical SMILES | O=C(N)NC1=C(C(C2=CC=C(Cl)C=C2Cl)=O)OC3=CC(OS(=O)(C)=O)=CC=C13 | ||
分子式 | C17H12Cl2N2O6S | 分子量 | 443.26 |
溶解度 | DMSO : 100 mg/mL (225.60 mM; Need ultrasonic) | 储存条件 | Store at -20°C |
General tips | 请根据产品在不同溶剂中的溶解度选择合适的溶剂配制储备液;一旦配成溶液,请分装保存,避免反复冻融造成的产品失效。 储备液的保存方式和期限:-80°C 储存时,请在 6 个月内使用,-20°C 储存时,请在 1 个月内使用。 为了提高溶解度,请将管子加热至37℃,然后在超声波浴中震荡一段时间。 |
||
Shipping Condition | 评估样品解决方案:配备蓝冰进行发货。所有其他可用尺寸:配备RT,或根据请求配备蓝冰。 |
制备储备液 | |||
1 mg | 5 mg | 10 mg | |
1 mM | 2.256 mL | 11.2801 mL | 22.5601 mL |
5 mM | 0.4512 mL | 2.256 mL | 4.512 mL |
10 mM | 0.2256 mL | 1.128 mL | 2.256 mL |
第一步:请输入基本实验信息(考虑到实验过程中的损耗,建议多配一只动物的药量) | ||||||||||
给药剂量 | mg/kg | 动物平均体重 | g | 每只动物给药体积 | ul | 动物数量 | 只 | |||
第二步:请输入动物体内配方组成(配方适用于不溶于水的药物;不同批次药物配方比例不同,请联系GLPBIO为您提供正确的澄清溶液配方) | ||||||||||
% DMSO % % Tween 80 % saline | ||||||||||
计算重置 |
计算结果:
工作液浓度: mg/ml;
DMSO母液配制方法: mg 药物溶于 μL DMSO溶液(母液浓度 mg/mL,
体内配方配制方法:取 μL DMSO母液,加入 μL PEG300,混匀澄清后加入μL Tween 80,混匀澄清后加入 μL saline,混匀澄清。
1. 首先保证母液是澄清的;
2.
一定要按照顺序依次将溶剂加入,进行下一步操作之前必须保证上一步操作得到的是澄清的溶液,可采用涡旋、超声或水浴加热等物理方法助溶。
3. 以上所有助溶剂都可在 GlpBio 网站选购。
Can the anti-inflammatory potential of PDE4 inhibitors be realized: guarded optimism or wishful thinking?
Br J Pharmacol 2008 Oct;155(3):288-90.PMID:18660832DOI:PMC2567889
PDE4 inhibitors have been in development as a novel anti-inflammatory therapy since the 1980s with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) being primary indications. Despite initial optimism, none have yet reached the market. In most cases, the development of PDE4 inhibitors of various structural classes, including cilomilast, filaminast, Lirimilast, piclamilast, tofimilast, AWD-12-281 (aka GSK 842470), CDP840, CI-1018, D-4418, IC485, L-826,141, SCH 351391 and V11294A has been discontinued due to lack of efficacy. A primary problem is the low therapeutic ratio of these compounds, which severely limits the dose that can be given. Indeed, for many of these compounds it is likely that the maximum tolerated dose is either sub-therapeutic or at the very bottom of the efficacy dose-response curve. Therefore, the challenge is to overcome this limitation. It is, therefore, encouraging that many 'new(er)' PDE4 inhibitors in development are reported to have an improved therapeutic window including tetomilast, oglemilast, apremilast, ONO 6126, IPL-512602 and IPL-455903 (aka HT-0712), although the basis for their superior tolerability has not been disclosed. In addition, other approaches are possible that may allow the anti-inflammatory activity of PDE inhibitors to be realized. Accordingly, this Commentary endorses the view of Spina (2008), published in the current issue of the British Journal of Pharmacology, that the therapeutic utility of PDE4 inhibitors to suppress inflammation still remains a viable concept.