Metanephrine
(Synonyms: 间甲肾上腺素) 目录号 : GC44168An inactive metabolite of epinephrine
Cas No.:5001-33-2
Sample solution is provided at 25 µL, 10mM.
Quality Control & SDS
- View current batch:
- Purity: >95.00%
- COA (Certificate Of Analysis)
- SDS (Safety Data Sheet)
- Datasheet
Metanephrine is a metabolite of epinephrine produced by the action of catechol-O-methyl transferase on epinephrine. [1] Determination of plasma or urinary metanephrine is considered the principal test for the clinical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma, an adrenal medullary neuroendocrine tumor.[2]
Reference:
[1]. Kopin, I.J., Axelrod, J., and Gordon, E. The metabolic fate of H3-epinephrine and C14-metanephrine in the rat. The Journal of Biological Chemisty 236, 2109-2136 (1961).
[2]. Wolthers, B.G., Kema, I.P., Volmer, M., et al. Evaluation of urinary metanephrine and normetanephrine enzyme immunoassay (ELISA) kits by comparison with isotope dilution mass spectrometry. Clinical Chemistry 43, 114-120 (1997).
Cas No. | 5001-33-2 | SDF | |
别名 | 间甲肾上腺素 | ||
化学名 | 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy-α-[(methylamino)methyl]-benzenemethanol | ||
Canonical SMILES | COC1=C(O)C=CC(C(O)CNC)=C1 | ||
分子式 | C10H15NO3 | 分子量 | 197.2 |
溶解度 | 20mg/mL in DMSO, 20mg/mL in DMF, 20mg/mL in Ethanol | 储存条件 | Store at -20°C |
General tips | 请根据产品在不同溶剂中的溶解度选择合适的溶剂配制储备液;一旦配成溶液,请分装保存,避免反复冻融造成的产品失效。 储备液的保存方式和期限:-80°C 储存时,请在 6 个月内使用,-20°C 储存时,请在 1 个月内使用。 为了提高溶解度,请将管子加热至37℃,然后在超声波浴中震荡一段时间。 |
||
Shipping Condition | 评估样品解决方案:配备蓝冰进行发货。所有其他可用尺寸:配备RT,或根据请求配备蓝冰。 |
制备储备液 | |||
1 mg | 5 mg | 10 mg | |
1 mM | 5.071 mL | 25.355 mL | 50.7099 mL |
5 mM | 1.0142 mL | 5.071 mL | 10.142 mL |
10 mM | 0.5071 mL | 2.5355 mL | 5.071 mL |
第一步:请输入基本实验信息(考虑到实验过程中的损耗,建议多配一只动物的药量) | ||||||||||
给药剂量 | mg/kg | 动物平均体重 | g | 每只动物给药体积 | ul | 动物数量 | 只 | |||
第二步:请输入动物体内配方组成(配方适用于不溶于水的药物;不同批次药物配方比例不同,请联系GLPBIO为您提供正确的澄清溶液配方) | ||||||||||
% DMSO % % Tween 80 % saline | ||||||||||
计算重置 |
计算结果:
工作液浓度: mg/ml;
DMSO母液配制方法: mg 药物溶于 μL DMSO溶液(母液浓度 mg/mL,
体内配方配制方法:取 μL DMSO母液,加入 μL PEG300,混匀澄清后加入μL Tween 80,混匀澄清后加入 μL saline,混匀澄清。
1. 首先保证母液是澄清的;
2.
一定要按照顺序依次将溶剂加入,进行下一步操作之前必须保证上一步操作得到的是澄清的溶液,可采用涡旋、超声或水浴加热等物理方法助溶。
3. 以上所有助溶剂都可在 GlpBio 网站选购。
Advances in Metanephrine testing for the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma
Clin Lab Med 2004 Mar;24(1):85-103.PMID:15157558DOI:10.1016/j.cll.2004.01.015.
Pheochromocytoma is a lethal tumor of chromaffin cells of the adrenal medulla that produces episodes of hypertension with the symptoms of palpitations, severe headaches, and sweating. The diagnosis of pheochromocytoma is a challenging one; autopsy series suggest that many pheochromocytomas are not clinically suspected, and the undiagnosed tumor can be associated with morbid consequences. The testing of catecholamines, metanephrines, and Vanillylymandelic acid commonly is used for screening of pheochromocytoma. The diagnostic value of various biochemical tests,as reported in recent Mayo and National Institutes of Health studies, have been compared and discussed in detail. The recent developments in the methodologies of metanephrines testing also are presented.
No effect of acidification or freezing on urinary Metanephrine levels
J Endocrinol Invest 2020 Jan;43(1):53-56.PMID:31228104DOI:10.1007/s40618-019-01076-9.
Background: Urinary Metanephrine is a reliable method to estimate catecholamine secretion. Traditionally, urinary metanephrines are collected into chilled containers containing hydrochloric acid (HCl) and most laboratories freeze urinary samples before analysis. It is uncertain if these pre-analytic procedures alter Metanephrine values. Aim: To evaluate if acidifying and freezing urine samples affect the accuracy of urinary Metanephrine measurements. Methods: Random urine samples from healthy individuals were collected. Urine samples were distributed into two containers: with HCl 50% homogenized with urine to obtain pH < 2, and without HCl. Each container was divided again into aliquots for immediate measurement or freezing. One aliquot with acid (group 1) and another without acid (group 2) were sent immediately to the laboratory for testing (HPLC), while the other two aliquots, one with acid (group 3) and another without it (group 4) were frozen for 3 months at - 20 °C. Bland-Altman's test was used to analyze inter-assay agreement between measurements. Results: A total of 15 individuals were included (mean age 27.5 ± 5.9 years, 8 male and 14 white). No difference was observed on mean urinary Metanephrine/creatinine ratio between groups: group 1: 0.23 ± 0.11, group 2: 0.22 ± 0.07, group 3: 0.25 ± 0.13, group 4: 0.25 ± 0.15 mg/g creatinine; P > 0.05 for all the comparisons). Bland-Altman's analysis showed agreement between the standard method (group 1) and the experimental method (group 4). Conclusion: Measurement of urinary metanephrines by HPLC method is not influenced by sample acidification nor freezing at - 20 °C for 3 months.
Accurate Location of Catheter Tip With the Free-to-Total Metanephrine Ratio During Adrenal Vein Sampling
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022 Feb 24;13:842968.PMID:35282466DOI:10.3389/fendo.2022.842968.
Background: The selectivity index (SI) of cortisol is used to document correct catheter placement during adrenal vein sampling (AVS) in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA). We aimed to determine the cutoff values of the SIs based on cortisol, free Metanephrine, and the free-to-total Metanephrine ratio (FTMR) using an adapted AVS protocol in combination with CT. Methods: Adults with PA and referred for AVS were recruited in two hypertension centers. The cortisol and free metanephrine-derived SIs were calculated as the concentration of the analyte in adrenal veins divided by the concentration of the analyte in the distal vena cava. The FTMR-derived SI was calculated as the concentration of free Metanephrine in the adrenal vein divided by that of total Metanephrine in the ipsilateral adrenal vein. The AVS was classified as an unequivocal radiological success (uAVS) if the tip of the catheter was seen in the adrenal vein. The SI cutoffs of each index marker were established using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results: Out of 125 enrolled patients, 65 patients had an uAVS. The SI cutoffs were 2.6 for cortisol, 10.0 for free Metanephrine, 0.31 for the FTMR on the left side, and 2.5, 9.9, and 0.25 on the right side. Compared to free Metanephrine and the FTMR, cortisol misclassified AVS as unsuccessful in 36.6% and 39.0% of the cases, respectively. Conclusion: This study is the first to calculate the SIs of cortisol, free Metanephrine, and the FTMR indices for the AVS procedure. It confirms that free metanephrine-based SIs are better than those based on cortisol.
Metanephrine neuroendocrine tumor marker detection by SERS using Au nanoparticle/Au film sandwich architecture
Biomed Microdevices 2016 Feb;18(1):12.PMID:26820563DOI:10.1007/s10544-016-0037-3.
Neuroendocrine tumors, such as pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma, are dangerous tumors that constitute a potential threat for a large number of patients. Currently, the biochemical diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors is based on measurement of the direct secretory products of the adrenomedullary-sympathetic system or of their metabolites, such as catecholamines or their Metanephrine derivatives, from plasma or urine. The techniques used for analysis of plasma free metanephrines, i.e. high-performance liquid chromatography or high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass-spectrometry are technically-demanding and time consuming, which limit their availability. Here we demonstrate a simple, fast and low-cost method for detecting Metanephrine by Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS). The protocol consists in using evaporation-induced self-assembly of gold (Au) nanoparticles incubated with the analyte, on planar gold films. The assembly process produces regions with a dense distribution of both inter-particle gaps and particle-film gaps. Finite-difference time-domain simulations confirm that both kinds of gaps are locations of enhanced electromagnetic fields resulting from inter-particle and particle-film plasmonic coupling, useful for SERS amplification. Metanephrine vibrational bands assignment was performed according to density functional theory calculations. Metanephrine metabolite was detected in liquid at concentration levels lower than previously reported for other similar metabolites. The obtained results demonstrate that the Au nanoparticle/Au film exhibits noticeable SERS amplification of the adsorbed metabolite and can be used in the design of efficient, stable SERS-active substrates for the detection and identification of specific tumor markers.
Falsely elevated plasma Metanephrine in patients taking midodrine
Ann Clin Biochem 2018 Jul;55(4):509-515.PMID:29357678DOI:10.1177/0004563218755817.
Plasma metanephrines have become the biochemical test of choice for suspected phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas in many institutions. We encountered two separate cases of significantly elevated plasma metanephrines in patients taking midodrine, a sympathomimetic drug used in the treatment of severe postural hypotension, in the absence of a diagnosis of phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas. Upon stopping midodrine treatment, plasma Metanephrine concentrations returned to normal in both patients. To explore the hypothesis that midodrine or its metabolite desglymidodrine might interfere with the metanephrines assay, we tested the interaction of midodrine with Metanephrine assays from two different centres. High-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry on plasma samples and on methanolic extract of midodrine demonstrated co-elution of the metabolite desglymidodrine with Metanephrine. We conclude that patients taking midodrine may have falsely elevated plasma Metanephrine as a result of analytical interference, and clinicians need to be aware of this problem.