Opioid receptor modulator 1

Molecular mechanisms of opioid receptor-dependent signaling and behavior

Opioid receptors have been targeted for the treatment of pain and related disorders for thousands of years and remain the most widely used analgesics in the clinic. Mu (μ), kappa (κ), and delta (δ) opioid receptors represent the originally classified receptor subtypes, with opioid receptor like-1 (ORL1) being the least characterized. All four receptors are G-protein coupled and activate inhibitory G proteins. These receptors form homo- and heterodimeric complexes and signal to kinase cascades and scaffold a variety of proteins.The authors discuss classic mechanisms and developments in understanding opioid tolerance and opioid receptor signaling and highlight advances in opioid molecular pharmacology, behavioral pharmacology, and human genetics. The authors put into context how opioid receptor signaling leads to the modulation of behavior with the potential for therapeutic intervention. Finally, the authors conclude there is a continued need for more translational work on opioid receptors in vivo.

How μ-opioid receptor recognizes fentanyl

Roughly half of the drug overdose-related deaths in the United States are related to synthetic opioids represented by fentanyl which is a potent agonist of mu-opioid receptor (mOR). In recent years, X-ray crystal structures of mOR in complex with morphine derivatives have been determined; however, structural basis of mOR activation by fentanyl-like opioids remains lacking. Exploiting the X-ray structure of BU72-bound mOR and several molecular simulation techniques, we elucidated the detailed binding mechanism of fentanyl. Surprisingly, in addition to the salt-bridge binding mode common to morphinan opiates, fentanyl can move deeper and form a stable hydrogen bond with the conserved His297^6.52, which has been suggested to modulate mOR's ligand affinity and pH dependence by previous mutagenesis experiments. Intriguingly, this secondary binding mode is only accessible when His297^6.52 adopts a neutral HID tautomer. Alternative binding modes may represent a general mechanism in G protein-coupled receptor-ligand recognition.

Molecular insights into the biased signaling mechanism of the μ-opioid receptor

GPCR functional selectivity opens new opportunities for the design of safer drugs. Ligands orchestrate GPCR signaling cascades by modulating the receptor conformational landscape. Our study provides insights into the dynamic mechanism enabling opioid ligands to preferentially activate the G protein over the β-arrestin pathways through the μ-opioid receptor (μOR). We combine functional assays in living cells, solution NMR spectroscopy, and enhanced-sampling molecular dynamic simulations to identify the specific μOR conformations induced by G protein-biased agonists. In particular, we describe the dynamic and allosteric communications between the ligand-binding pocket and the receptor intracellular domains, through conserved motifs in class A GPCRs. Most strikingly, the biased agonists trigger μOR conformational changes in the intracellular loop 1 and helix 8 domains, which may impair β-arrestin binding or signaling. The findings may apply to other GPCR families and provide key molecular information that could facilitate the design of biased ligands.

Bifunctional μ opioid and σ1 receptor ligands as novel analgesics with reduced side effects

Opioid analgesics are highly effective painkillers for the treatment of moderate or severe pain, but they are associated with a number of undesirable adverse effects, including the development of tolerance, addiction, constipation and life-threatening respiratory depression. The development of new and safer analgesics with innovative mechanisms of action, which can enhance the efficacy in comparison to available treatments and reduce their side effects, is urgently needed. The sigma-1 receptor (σ₁R), a unique Ca²⁺-sensing chaperone protein, is expressed throughout pain-modulating tissues and affects neurotransmission by interacting with different protein partners, including molecular targets that participate in nociceptive signalling, such as the μ-opioid receptor (MOR), N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) and cannabinoid 1 receptor (CB₁R). Overwhelming pharmacological and genetic evidence indicates that σ₁R antagonists induce anti-hypersensitive effects in sensitising pain conditions (e.g. chemically induced, inflammatory and neuropathic pain) and enhance opioid analgesia but not opioid-mediated detrimental effects. It has been suggested that balanced modulation of MORs and σ₁Rs may improve both the therapeutic efficacy and safety of opioids. This review summarises the functional profiles of ligands with mixed MOR agonist and σ₁R antagonist activities and highlights their therapeutic potentials for pain management. Dual MOR agonism/σ₁R antagonism represents a promising avenue for the development of potent and safer analgesics.

Modulation of the MOP Receptor (μ Opioid Receptor) by Imidazo[1,2- a]imidazole-5,6-Diones: In Search of the Elucidation of the Mechanism of Action

The μ-opioid receptors belong to the family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), and their activation triggers a cascade of intracellular relays with the final effect of analgesia. Classical agonists of this receptor, such as morphine, are the main targets in the treatment of both acute and chronic pain. However, the dangerous side effects, such as respiratory depression or addiction, significantly limit their widespread use. The allosteric centers of the receptors exhibit large structural diversity within particular types and even subtypes. Currently, a considerable interest is aroused by the modulation of μ-opioid receptors. The application of such a technique may result in a reduction in the dose or even discontinuation of classical opiates, thus eliminating the side effects typical of this class of drugs. Our aim is to obtain a series of 1-aryl-5,6(1H)dioxo-2,3-dihydroimidazo[1,2-a]imidazole derivatives and provide more information about their activity and selectivity on OP3 (MOP, human mu opioid receptor). The study was based on an observation that some carbonyl derivatives of 1-aryl-2-aminoimidazoline cooperate strongly with morphine or DAMGO in sub-threshold doses, producing similar results to those of normal active doses. To elucidate the possible mechanism of such enhancement, we performed a few in vitro functional tests (involving cAMP and β-arrestin recruitment) and a radioligand binding assay on CHO-K1 cells with the expression of the OP3 receptor. One of the compounds had no orthosteric affinity or intrinsic activity, but inhibited the efficiency of DAMGO. These results allow to conclude that this compound is a negative allosteric modulator (NAM) of the human μ-opioid receptor.