Pipobroman
(Synonyms: 哌泊溴烷) 目录号 : GC33075Pipobroman (PB, Vercyte), a neutral amide of piperazine, acts as an alkylating agent with antiproliferative activity.
Cas No.:54-91-1
Sample solution is provided at 25 µL, 10mM.
Quality Control & SDS
- View current batch:
- Purity: >98.00%
- COA (Certificate Of Analysis)
- SDS (Safety Data Sheet)
- Datasheet
Pipobroman (PB, Vercyte), a neutral amide of piperazine, acts as an alkylating agent with antiproliferative activity.
[1] Francesco Passamonti, Mario Lazzarino. Leuk Lymphoma. 2003 Sep;44(9):1483-8.
Cas No. | 54-91-1 | SDF | |
别名 | 哌泊溴烷 | ||
Canonical SMILES | O=C(N1CCN(C(CCBr)=O)CC1)CCBr | ||
分子式 | C10H16Br2N2O2 | 分子量 | 356.05 |
溶解度 | DMSO : ≥ 36 mg/mL (101.11 mM) | 储存条件 | Store at -20°C |
General tips | 请根据产品在不同溶剂中的溶解度选择合适的溶剂配制储备液;一旦配成溶液,请分装保存,避免反复冻融造成的产品失效。 储备液的保存方式和期限:-80°C 储存时,请在 6 个月内使用,-20°C 储存时,请在 1 个月内使用。 为了提高溶解度,请将管子加热至37℃,然后在超声波浴中震荡一段时间。 |
||
Shipping Condition | 评估样品解决方案:配备蓝冰进行发货。所有其他可用尺寸:配备RT,或根据请求配备蓝冰。 |
制备储备液 | |||
1 mg | 5 mg | 10 mg | |
1 mM | 2.8086 mL | 14.043 mL | 28.0859 mL |
5 mM | 0.5617 mL | 2.8086 mL | 5.6172 mL |
10 mM | 0.2809 mL | 1.4043 mL | 2.8086 mL |
第一步:请输入基本实验信息(考虑到实验过程中的损耗,建议多配一只动物的药量) | ||||||||||
给药剂量 | mg/kg | 动物平均体重 | g | 每只动物给药体积 | ul | 动物数量 | 只 | |||
第二步:请输入动物体内配方组成(配方适用于不溶于水的药物;不同批次药物配方比例不同,请联系GLPBIO为您提供正确的澄清溶液配方) | ||||||||||
% DMSO % % Tween 80 % saline | ||||||||||
计算重置 |
计算结果:
工作液浓度: mg/ml;
DMSO母液配制方法: mg 药物溶于 μL DMSO溶液(母液浓度 mg/mL,
体内配方配制方法:取 μL DMSO母液,加入 μL PEG300,混匀澄清后加入μL Tween 80,混匀澄清后加入 μL saline,混匀澄清。
1. 首先保证母液是澄清的;
2.
一定要按照顺序依次将溶剂加入,进行下一步操作之前必须保证上一步操作得到的是澄清的溶液,可采用涡旋、超声或水浴加热等物理方法助溶。
3. 以上所有助溶剂都可在 GlpBio 网站选购。
Pipobroman therapy of polycythemia vera
Blood 1982 May;59(5):890-4.PMID:7074217doi
Between 1971 and 1981, 74 patients with polycythemia vera were treated with Pipobroman using a high-dose induction, low-dose maintenance regimen. Complete remission was achieved in 51 of 54 previously untreated patients (94.4%) and in 17 of 20 patients (85%) previously treated wih radioactive phosphorus (32 p) and busulfan. The earliest modifications were noted on day 16, and on the average, blood counts were normal by day 45. Thirty percent of the patients relapsed, the mean duration of the remission being 17.5 mo. Following recurrence Pipobroman was consistently effective in the same doses but the mean duration of the next remissions was 10 mo. Transient leukopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 8% and 7% of patients, respectively, during initial phase, and anemia was noted in 3 patients. Macrocytosis was noted in 20% of patients during maintenance phase. Three cases of acute leukemia and 3 cases of osteomyelosclerosis were recorded, all occurring in patients who had previously received 32 p and/or busulfan. No hematologic malignancies were seen among patients treated with Pipobroman alone; follow-up exceeded 6 yr for 20 patients and the median follow-up period was 3.6 yr. Pipobroman appears safer than other alkylating agents; it is as effective as 32 p and works more quickly. Longer follow-up will be required to evaluate the drug's oncogenic potential, which is still not known.
Pipobroman therapy of essential thrombocythemia
Scand J Haematol 1986 Oct;37(4):306-9.PMID:3787181DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0609.1986.tb02317.x.
We report our results with Pipobroman (PB) therapy in patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET). 21 consecutive untreated patients were treated with PB from 1975 to 1984. PB was given at a dose of 1 mg/kg/d until platelet count dropped below 600 X 10(9)/l. In 18 patients (86%) a hematological remission was obtained. Median duration of induction phase was 49 d. In all cases a maintenance regimen was required at a dose ranging from 0.2 mg/kg/d to 0.5 mg/kg/d, according to platelet number. Follow-up of responder patients ranged from 6 to 108 months (median 17 months). Treatment was well tolerated and we observed only a very moderate and transient hematological toxicity. No patient had relapsed or developed secondary neoplasms at the time of writing. Median survival time of all patients was 24 months (range 10-115).
Treatment of polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: the role of Pipobroman
Leuk Lymphoma 2003 Sep;44(9):1483-8.PMID:14565648DOI:10.3109/10428190309178768.
Pipobroman (PB) is a neutral amide of piperazine with a chemical structure close to that of alkylating agents, although the exact mechanism of action of PB has not been demonstrated. PB has well documented clinical activity in polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET). Recent long-term follow-up studies on PV and ET patients receiving PB have facilitated the definition of the risk of late transformation into myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM) or acute leukemia (AL). This report gives an overview of the treatment with PB in patients with PV and ET focusing on clinical activity, administration dose and schedule, toxicity, impact on short- and long-term complications. From our experience and from the data reported in the literature the high clinical activity of PB in both PVand ET becomes evident. This drug allows, within 3 months, to attain a response in more than 90% of patients, without clinically relevant toxicities. The 10-years risk of thrombosis of patients treated with PB is about 15%, similar to that registered with hydroxyurea, the most widely used agent in PVand ET. The antiproliferative activity of PB on bone marrow megakaryocytes seems of particular value in lowering the occurrence of post-PV and post-ET MMM, whose risk (< 4% at 10 years) is the lowest registered with available treatments. The 10-year risk of acute leukemia with PB is 5% in PVand 3% in ET, which is only slightly higher than that expected as a natural evolution of the disease. In conclusion, the use of PB is a definite alternative to hydroxyurea in patients with PV and ET at high risk of thrombosis.
Pipobroman is safe and effective treatment for patients with essential thrombocythaemia at high risk of thrombosis
Br J Haematol 2002 Mar;116(4):855-61.PMID:11886392DOI:10.1046/j.0007-1048.2002.03367.x.
Essential thrombocythaemia (ET) is a disease associated with an elevated risk of thrombosis. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of Pipobroman (PB) in the long-term control of ET patients who had, at diagnosis, one or more of the following currently known risk factors for thrombosis or haemorrhage (high-risk patients): age > 60 years, history of thrombosis or haemorrhage, platelets >1000 x 10(9)/l. From 1978 to 2000, with a median follow-up of 10 years, 118 previously untreated high-risk ET patients (median age 62 years, range 25-82), were treated with PB at the starting dose of 0.8-1 mg/kg/d. All patients reached a platelet count <600 x 10(9)/l and 91% achieved a platelet count <400 x 10(9)/l. During follow-up, 13 patients had thrombosis, with a 10-year cumulative risk of 14%. Acute myeloid leukaemia, myelofibrosis and solid tumours occurred in three, two and seven patients with a 10-year cumulative risk of 3%, 2% and 7% respectively. Actuarial survival at 20 years was 64% and the standardized mortality ratio was 1.1 (95% CI: 0.7-1.7), not statistically different from the general population (P = 0.54). Age was associated with a higher risk of death (P = 0.00009) and thrombosis (P = 0.003). The duration of PB treatment did not correlate with the occurrence of second malignancies. This study, with a median follow-up of 10 years, demonstrates that Pipobroman is effective and well tolerated. The low cumulative 10-year risk of thrombosis, leukaemia and solid tumours indicates that Pipobroman is an adequate treatment for patients with high risk ET.
Long-term incidence of hematological evolution in three French prospective studies of hydroxyurea and Pipobroman in polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia
Semin Thromb Hemost 2006 Jun;32(4 Pt 2):417-21.PMID:16810617DOI:10.1055/s-2006-942762.
Despite recent discoveries made in myeloproliferative disorders other than chronic myelogenous leukemia, which it is hoped will result in earlier diagnosis, and better evaluation and management of patients, hematological evolution to myelofibrosis, acute leukemia, and myelodysplastic syndromes (AL/MDS) remain major causes of long-term mortality in polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) patients. Evaluation of long-term leukemogenic risk of currently available drugs, therefore, is crucial. We report updated results of three French prospective trials of hydroxyurea and Pipobroman in PV and ET patients with a median follow-up longer than 10 years. The results show that the incidence of AL/MDS is higher than previously reported with no evidence of a plateau (with approximately 40% of AL/MDS cases occurring after the 12th year of follow-up). Although hydroxyurea currently remains the first choice in the treatment of high-risk PV and ET patients, the use of nonleukemogenic drugs, such as interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) or anagrelide, should be assessed more widely in randomized trials using accurate diagnostic criteria and taking into account the presence of the JAK2 mutation, given that they may have an impact on disease evolution.