QL9

Peptide length variants p2Ca and QL9 present distinct conformations to L(d)-specific T cells

Recent advances have provided insights into how the TCR interacts with MHC/peptide complexes and a rationale to predict optimal epitopes for MHC binding and T cell recognition. For example, peptides of nine residues are predicted to be optimal for binding to H2-L(d), although 8 mer epitopes have also been identified. It has been predicted that 8 mer and 9 mer length variant peptides bound to L(d) present identical epitopes to T cells. However, in contrast to this prediction, we demonstrate here that the 8 mer peptide p2Ca and its 9 mer length variant QL9, extended by an N-terminal glutamine, assume distinct conformations when bound to L(d). We generated self-L(d)-restricted CTL clones specific for p2Ca that recognize L(d)/QL9 poorly if at all. This result is in sharp contrast to what has been observed with L(d)-alloreactive T cells that possess a much higher affinity for L(d)/QL9 than for L(d)/p2Ca. Alanine substitutions of the N-terminal residues of the QL9 peptide rescue detection by these self-L(d)/p2Ca-specific T cells, but decrease recognition by the L(d)-alloreactive 2C T cell clone. In addition, 2C T cell recognition of the p2Ca peptide is affected by different alanine substitutions compared with 2C T cell recognition of the QL9 peptide. These data clearly demonstrate that the p2Ca and QL9 peptides assume distinct conformations when bound to L(d) and, furthermore, demonstrate that there is flexibility in peptide binding within the MHC class I cleft.

Different thermodynamic binding mechanisms and peptide fine specificities associated with a panel of structurally similar high-affinity T cell receptors

To understand the mechanisms that govern T cell receptor (TCR)-peptide MHC (pMHC) binding and the role that different regions of the TCR play in affinity and antigen specificity, we have studied the TCR from T cell clone 2C. High-affinity mutants of the 2C TCR that bind QL9-L(d) as a strong agonist were generated previously by site-directed mutagenesis of complementarity determining regions (CDRs) 1beta, 2alpha, 3alpha, or 3beta. We performed isothermal titration calorimetry to assess whether they use similar thermodynamic mechanisms to achieve high affinity for QL9-L(d). Four of the five TCRs examined bound to QL9-L(d) in an enthalpically driven, entropically unfavorable manner. In contrast, the high-affinity CDR1beta mutant resembled the wild-type 2C TCR interaction, with favorable entropy. To assess fine specificity, we measured the binding and kinetics of these mutants for both QL9-L(d) and a single amino acid peptide variant of QL9, called QL9-Y5-L(d). While 2C and most of the mutants had equal or higher affinity for the Y5 variant than for QL9, mutant CDR1beta exhibited 8-fold lower affinity for Y5 compared to QL9. To examine possible structural correlates of the thermodynamic and fine specificity signatures of the TCRs, the structure of unliganded QL9-L(d) was solved and compared to structures of the 2C TCR/QL9-L(d) complex and three high-affinity TCR/QL9-L(d) complexes. Our findings show that the QL9-L(d) complex does not undergo major conformational changes upon binding. Thus, subtle changes in individual CDRs account for the diverse thermodynamic and kinetic binding mechanisms and for the different peptide fine specificities.

Cellular uptake followed by class I MHC presentation of some exogenous peptides contributes to T cell stimulatory capacity

The T cell stimulatory activity of peptides is known to be associated with the cell surface stability and lifetime of the peptide-MHC (pepMHC) complex. In this report, soluble high-affinity T cell receptors (TCRs) that are specific for pepMHC complexes recognized by the mouse CD8+ clone 2C were used to monitor the cell surface lifetimes of synthetic agonist peptides. In the 2C system, L(d)-binding peptide p2Ca (LSPFPFDL) has up to 10,000-fold lower activity than peptide QL9 (QLSPFPFDL) even though the 2C TCR binds to p2Ca-L(d) and QL9-L(d) complexes with similar affinities. Unexpectedly, p2Ca-L(d) complexes were found to have a longer cell surface lifetime than QL9-L(d) complexes. However, the strong agonist activity of QL9 correlated with its ability to participate in efficient intracellular delivery followed by cell surface expression of the peptide, resulting in high and persistent surface levels of QL9-L(d). The ability of target cells to take up and present QL9 was observed with TAP-deficient cells and TAP-positive cells, including dendritic cells. The process was brefeldin A-sensitive, indicating a requirement for transport of the pepMHC through the ER and/or golgi. Thus, strong T cell stimulatory activity of some pepMHC complexes can be accomplished not only through long cell surface lifetimes of the ligand, but through a mechanism that leads to delayed presentation of the exogenous antigen after intracellular uptake.

Engineering the binding properties of the T cell receptor:peptide:MHC ternary complex that governs T cell activity

The potency of a T cell is determined in large part by two interactions, binding of a cognate peptide to the MHC, and binding of the T cell receptor (TCR) to this pepMHC. Various studies have attempted to assess the relative importance of these interactions, and to correlate the corresponding binding parameters with the level of T cell activity mediated by the peptide. To further examine the properties that govern optimal T cell activity, here we engineered both the peptide:MHC interaction and the TCR:pepMHC interaction to generate improved T cell activity. Using a system involving the 2C TCR and its allogeneic pepMHC ligand, QL9-L(d), we show that a peptide substitution of QL9 (F5R), increased the affinity and stability of the pep-L(d) complex (e.g. cell surface t(1/2)-values of 13 min for QL9-L(d) versus 87 min for F5R-L(d)). However, activity of peptide F5R for 2C T cells was not enhanced because the 2C TCR bound with very low affinity to F5R-L(d) compared to QL9-L(d) (K(D)=300 microM and K(D)=1.6 microM, respectively). To improve the affinity, yeast display of the 2C TCR was used to engineer two mutant TCRs that exhibited higher affinity for F5R-L(d) (K(D)=1.2 and 6.3 microM). T cells that expressed these higher affinity TCRs were stimulated by F5R-L(d) in the absence of CD8, and the highest affinity TCR exhibited enhanced activity for F5R compared to QL9. The results provide a guide to designing the explicit binding parameters that govern optimal T cell activities.

Different strategies adopted by K(b) and L(d) to generate T cell specificity directed against their respective bound peptides

Mouse T cell clone 2C recognizes two different major histocompatibility (MHC) ligands, the self MHC K(b) and the allogeneic MHC L(d). Two distinct peptides, SIY (SIYRYYGL) and QL9 (QLSPFPFDL), act as strong and specific agonists when bound to K(b) and L(d), respectively. To explore further the mechanisms involved in peptide potency and specificity, here we examined a collection of single amino acid peptide variants of SIY and QL9 for 1) T cell activity, 2) binding to their respective MHC, and 3) binding to the 2C T cell receptor (TCR) and high affinity TCR mutants. Characterization of SIY binding to MHC K(b) revealed significant effects of three SIY residues that were clearly embedded within the K(b) molecule. In contrast, QL9 binding to MHC L(d) was influenced by the majority of peptide side chains, distributed across the entire length of the peptide. Binding of the SIY-K(b) complex to the TCR involved three SIY residues that were pointed toward the TCR, whereas again the majority of QL9 residues influenced binding of TCRs, and thus the QL9 residues had impacts on both L(d) and TCR binding. In general, the magnitude of T cell activity mediated by a peptide variant was influenced more by peptide binding to MHC than by binding the TCR, especially for higher affinity TCRs. Findings with both systems, but QL9-L(d) in particular, suggest that many single-residue substitutions, introduced into peptides to improve their binding to MHC and thus their vaccine potential, could impair T cell reactivity due to their dual impact on TCR binding.