rGHRH(1-29)NH2

Continuous subcutaneous GHRH(1-29)NH2 promotes growth over 1 year in short, slowly growing children

We have treated eight pre-pubertal children with partial GH insufficiency with continuous subcutaneous infusions of GHRH(1-29)NH2 at a dose of 60 ng/kg/min for periods of up to 1 year. In five children treated for 1 year, mean growth velocity increased from 4.6 cm/year (range 4.4-5.2) to 7.0 cm/year (5.7-8.7) (P = 0.04). Three children treated for 3-6 months showed similar height velocity increases. A return to pretreatment growth rates was seen after cessation of treatment in all children. Twenty-four-hour GH profiles performed at intervals of 3 months showed sustained augmentation of pulsatile GH secretion without evidence of desensitization. The presence of pulsatile GH secretion during continuous GHRH administration provides strong evidence in man for the role of somatostatin in determining GH pulse frequency. The ability of the pituitary to respond to a supramaximal bolus of GHRH remained constant during the treatment. Continuous administration of GHRH(1-29)NH2 will become a practicable treatment when formulated into a sustained release or depot preparation. We have shown this to be an effective therapy for some short, slowly growing children. Further studies are required to establish the optimal dosage regimen.

Priming with GHRH (1-29) NH2: an aid in differential diagnosis between hypothalamic and pituitary deficiencies

More than 80% of children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) respond with a rise in growth hormone levels when given 1 microgram/kg body weight of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) in an i.v. bolus. We conducted a study to determine whether the failure of the remaining 20% to respond to GHRH is due to a pituitary deficiency or a secondary effect associated with chronically understimulated somatotrophs. We administered GHRH to "prime" 16 short-statured children (> 2 SD) presenting delayed growth (< 4 cm/year), who had not responded initially when given a single dose of GHRH. Priming consisted of administering GHRH (1-29) NH2 (5 micrograms/kg body weight, s.c.) for six consecutive days. Plasma GH response was studied again after an i.v. injection of 1 microgram/kg body weight of GHRH (1-29) NH2 on the seventh morning. On the basis of these results we were able to separate our patients into two groups: a) responders to priming (n = 8), whose GH responses to pharmacological and acute GHRH tests were < 10 ng/ml, with a 12-hour sleep secretion < 3 ng/ml/min. Priming increased the plasma GH response to acute GHRH in all the children in this group (6.0 +/- 2.1 ng/ml to 18.0 +/- 5.4 ng/ml; p < 0.001); b) non-responders to priming (n = 8), whose GH responses to pharmacological and acute GHRH tests were also < 10 ng/ml, with 12-hour sleep secretion < 3 ng/ml/min, but in whom priming with GH did not increase the plasma GH response (5.5 +/- 2.8 ng/ml to 6.2 +/- 2.9 ng/ml; p = NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Treatment with GHRH(1-29)NH2 in children with idiopathic short stature induces a sustained increase in growth velocity

Objective: Therapy with GHRH in patients with mild GH insufficiency appears to be more effective than in those with severe insufficiency. We, therefore, studied the clinical response of children with idiopathic short stature to treatment with GHRH(1-29)NH2 (GHRHa) for a period of 12 months.
Design: Eighteen short pre-pubertal children (aged 4.3-11.0 years, 17 male) with idiopathic short stature (height < 3rd centile, peak GH to provocative testing > 20 mU/l) were recruited to receive GHRHa 20 micrograms/kg by twice daily s.c. injection for one year. One patient was non-compliant and was withdrawn prior to 3 months of therapy. Pretreatment height velocity was calculated for 12 months and subjects were measured 3-monthly during therapy. Overnight GH profiles and s.c. GHRH tests (20 micrograms/kg) were performed at 0, 3, 6 and 12 months of therapy. In addition, an i.v. GHRH test (1 microgram/kg) was performed at the start and after 1 month of therapy.
Measurements: Overnight GH profiles were analysed using the Pulsar program.
Results: Mean (SD) height velocity (HV) increased from 4.8(0.9)cm/year pre-treatment to 7.2(1.6)cm/year after 12 months of therapy (P = 0.001). The children growing slowly (HV < 25th centile) before treatment had a greater growth response than those growing normally (HV > or = 25th centile) before treatment. Final height prediction increased by a mean (SD) of 3.4(2.6)cm. Overnight GH levels and GH responses to GHRH testing fell during the 12 months of therapy. Fasting blood glucose and insulin levels increased during therapy, as did IGF-I. Cessation of GHRHa was followed by catch-down growth during the first 3 months off therapy: mean (SD) HV 3.89(1.82)cm/year (P < 0.04), although the HV after 6 months (4.9(1.0))cm/year) and 12 months (4.4(1.0)cm/year) was not different from pretreatment values.
Conclusions: Short-term therapy with twice-daily s.c. injection of GHRHa (20 micrograms/kg) promoted linear growth in short children who were not GH-insufficient. The improved height velocity was sustained throughout the 12 months of treatment, followed by catch-down growth, and returned to pretreatment velocity after cessation of therapy.

Tumorigenic transformation of human prostatic epithelial cell line RWPE-1 by growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH)

Background: Growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and its receptors have been implicated in the progression of various tumors. In this study, we analyzed the carcinogenetic potential of exposure to GHRH of a nontumor human prostate epithelial cell line (RWPE-1) as well as its transforming effect in a xenograft model.
Methods: We performed cell viability, cell proliferation, adhesion and migration assays. In addition, metalloprotease (MMP)-2 activity by means gelatin zymography, GHRH-R subcellular location using confocal immunofluorescence microscopy and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels by enzyme-linked immunoassay were assessed. Besides, we developed an in vivo model in order vivo model to determine the role of GHRH on tumorigenic transformation of RWPE-1 cells.
Results: In cell cultures, we observed development of a migratory phenotype consistent with the gelatinolytic activity of MMP-2, expression of VEGF, as well as E-cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion and increased cell motility. Treatment with 0.1 ?M GHRH for 24 h significantly increased cell viability and cell proliferation. Similar effects of GHRH were seen in RWPE-1 tumors developed by subcutaneous injection of GHRH-treated cells in athymic nude mice, 49 days after inoculation.
Conclusions: Thus, GHRH appears to act as a cytokine in the transformation of RWPE-1 cells by mechanisms that likely involve epithelial-mesenchymal transition, thus reinforcing the role of GHRH in tumorigenesis of prostate.

The relative roles of continuous growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH(1-29)NH2) and intermittent somatostatin(1-14)(SS) in growth hormone (GH) pulse generation: studies in normal and post cranial irradiated individuals

Objectives: Pulsatile GH release in humans is thought to involve the coordinated interaction of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin (SS). Disordered GH secretion is seen in most patients following high dose (> 30 Gy) cranial irradiation in childhood and could result from dysregulation of these hypothalamic hormones or reflect direct pituitary damage. We have used a peptide 'clamp' to assess the relative roles of continuous GHRH and intermittent SS in GH pulse generation in healthy volunteers and short-and long-term survivors of childhood brain tumours.
Design: Randomized controlled study.
Patients: 12 adult male long-term survivors of childhood brain tumours (median age 17.0 years (15.2-19. 7); 12.2 years (5.8-14.0) postradiotherapy, > 30Gy whole brain irradiation) with 9 matched control volunteers and 6 short-term survivors of childhood brain tumours (median age 6.4 years (5.9-7. 7); 2.5 years (1.7-3.6) post radiotherapy, > 30Gy whole brain irradiation) with 6 matched controls (studies of spontaneous GH release alone).
Measurements: Serum GH concentrations in 24 h spontaneous GH profiles and during three 'clamp' studies: continuous GHRH(1-29)NH2 (60 ng/kg/minutes, subcutaneous infusion, 24 h); intermittent SS(1-14) withdrawal (20microg/m2/hour, intravenous infusion, 3 h on/1 h off, 2-3 cycles over 8-12 h); intermittent SS and continuous GHRH combined (2-3 cycles over 8-12 h). Data were analysed by spectral analysis, 'peak' and 'trough' determination and serial array averaging.
Results: In normal adults, discrete pulsatility was seen in all profiles of spontaneous GH secretion. Continuous GHRH amplified peak GH concentrations (median basal peak 21.1 mU/l vs. GHRH 62.0 mU/l, P = 0.008) whilst pulse timing remained unaffected. Rebound GH release following SS withdrawal alone was variable. Combining continuous GHRH with intermittent SS produced regular GH responses upon SS withdrawal (20.3 mU/l; range 2. 3-105.4). Heterogeneous patterns of spontaneous GH release were seen in the irradiated subjects. Spontaneous peak GH release was reduced in the children following irradiation (Irradiation 14.9 mU/l vs. Control 25.1 mU/l, P = 0.007). Peak GH concentrations were significantly amplified by GHRH in half of them. Adult long-term survivors had lower spontaneous GH concentrations and continuous GHRH amplified GH release in most subjects (Spontaneous 4.2 mU/l vs. GHRH 6.5 mU/l, P = 0.008) but peak concentrations remained far less than those of controls. Combining intermittent SS with continuous GHRH regularized GH release in many patients but the GH responses remained attenuated (4.6 mU/l; 2.5-17.5).
Conclusion: GH pulsatility can be generated in normal volunteers by the combination of continuous GHRH and intermittent SS and provides indirect evidence for a role for GHRH in GH synthesis and replenishment of stored GH pools at times of high SS tone. Patterns of GH release in short-and long-term survivors of childhood brain tumours are heterogeneous suggesting that combined hypothalamic deficiencies of GHRH and SS occur following high dose radiotherapy. The attenuated GH release seen in long-term survivors compared to controls suggests that GH secretory dysfunction does not simply reflect reduced GHRH and SS secretion, and that trophic effects or pituitary damage may be important with time.