Salcaprozate sodium
(Synonyms: 8-(2-羟基苯甲酰胺基)辛酸钠,SNAC) 目录号 : GC61261Salcaprozatesodium(SNAC)是一种口服吸收促进剂,有潜力作为口服形式的肝素和胰岛素的递送剂。Salcaprozatesodium可增加非共价大分子络合引起的亲脂性,从而增加小肠上皮细胞的被动跨细胞渗透。
Cas No.:203787-91-1
Sample solution is provided at 25 µL, 10mM.
Quality Control & SDS
- View current batch:
- Purity: >98.00%
- COA (Certificate Of Analysis)
- SDS (Safety Data Sheet)
- Datasheet
Salcaprozate sodium (SNAC), an oral absorption promoter, and has the potential as a delivery agent for oral forms of heparin and insulin. Salcaprozate sodium could increase passive transcellular permeation across small intestinal epithelia based on increased lipophilicity arising from non-covalent macromolecule complexation[1][2].
SNAC (12.5-400 μg/mL; 24 h) has no toxicity to Caco-2 cells, and the survival percentage is above 90% when SNAC is 200 μg/mL[3].SNAC (50 and 200 μg/mL) improves the apparent permeability coeffcient (Papp) of RA and SA-B by 2.14-fold and 3.68-fold compared with the Papp of SAs solution[3].
SNAC improves the oral absorption of both R1 and SAs and enhances bioavailability in rats[3].SNAC (2000 mg/kg/d; oral gavage for 13 weeks) related mortality is evident only at the 2000-mg/kg/d level, 20% among males and 50% among females; no clear cause of death is evident[1].SNAC (100-1000 mg/kg/d; oral gavage for 13 weeks) induces no mortality in the Wistar rat study at doses up to 1000 mg/kg/d[1]. Animal Model: Sprague-Dawley rats (6-7 weeks)[1]
[1]. Riley MGI, et, al. Subchronic oral toxicity of salcaprozate sodium (SNAC) in Sprague-Dawley and Wistar rats. Int J Toxicol. Jul-Aug 2009; 28(4):278-93. [2]. Twarog C, et, al. Intestinal Permeation Enhancers for Oral Delivery of Macromolecules: A Comparison between Salcaprozate Sodium (SNAC) and Sodium Caprate (C 10). Pharmaceutics. 2019 Feb 13; 11(2):78. [3]. Li Y, et, al. Impact of Sodium N-[8-(2-Hydroxybenzoyl)amino]-caprylate on Intestinal Permeability for Notoginsenoside R1 and Salvianolic Acids in Caco-2 Cells Transport and Rat Pharmacokinetics. Molecules. 2018 Nov 16; 23(11):2990.
Cas No. | 203787-91-1 | SDF | |
别名 | 8-(2-羟基苯甲酰胺基)辛酸钠,SNAC | ||
Canonical SMILES | O=C(O[Na])CCCCCCCNC(C1=CC=CC=C1O)=O | ||
分子式 | C15H20NNaO4 | 分子量 | 301.31 |
溶解度 | DMSO : 50 mg/mL (165.94 mM; Need ultrasonic) | 储存条件 | Store at -20°C |
General tips | 请根据产品在不同溶剂中的溶解度选择合适的溶剂配制储备液;一旦配成溶液,请分装保存,避免反复冻融造成的产品失效。 储备液的保存方式和期限:-80°C 储存时,请在 6 个月内使用,-20°C 储存时,请在 1 个月内使用。 为了提高溶解度,请将管子加热至37℃,然后在超声波浴中震荡一段时间。 |
||
Shipping Condition | 评估样品解决方案:配备蓝冰进行发货。所有其他可用尺寸:配备RT,或根据请求配备蓝冰。 |
制备储备液 | |||
1 mg | 5 mg | 10 mg | |
1 mM | 3.3188 mL | 16.5942 mL | 33.1884 mL |
5 mM | 0.6638 mL | 3.3188 mL | 6.6377 mL |
10 mM | 0.3319 mL | 1.6594 mL | 3.3188 mL |
第一步:请输入基本实验信息(考虑到实验过程中的损耗,建议多配一只动物的药量) | ||||||||||
给药剂量 | mg/kg | 动物平均体重 | g | 每只动物给药体积 | ul | 动物数量 | 只 | |||
第二步:请输入动物体内配方组成(配方适用于不溶于水的药物;不同批次药物配方比例不同,请联系GLPBIO为您提供正确的澄清溶液配方) | ||||||||||
% DMSO % % Tween 80 % saline | ||||||||||
计算重置 |
计算结果:
工作液浓度: mg/ml;
DMSO母液配制方法: mg 药物溶于 μL DMSO溶液(母液浓度 mg/mL,
体内配方配制方法:取 μL DMSO母液,加入 μL PEG300,混匀澄清后加入μL Tween 80,混匀澄清后加入 μL saline,混匀澄清。
1. 首先保证母液是澄清的;
2.
一定要按照顺序依次将溶剂加入,进行下一步操作之前必须保证上一步操作得到的是澄清的溶液,可采用涡旋、超声或水浴加热等物理方法助溶。
3. 以上所有助溶剂都可在 GlpBio 网站选购。
Intestinal Permeation Enhancers for Oral Delivery of Macromolecules: A Comparison between Salcaprozate sodium (SNAC) and Sodium Caprate (C10)
Pharmaceutics 2019 Feb 13;11(2):78.PMID:30781867DOI:10.3390/pharmaceutics11020078.
Salcaprozate sodium (SNAC) and sodium caprate (C10) are two of the most advanced intestinal permeation enhancers (PEs) that have been tested in clinical trials for oral delivery of macromolecules. Their effects on intestinal epithelia were studied for over 30 years, yet there is still debate over their mechanisms of action. C10 acts via openings of epithelial tight junctions and/or membrane perturbation, while for decades SNAC was thought to increase passive transcellular permeation across small intestinal epithelia based on increased lipophilicity arising from non-covalent macromolecule complexation. More recently, an additional mechanism for SNAC associated with a pH-elevating, monomer-inducing, and pepsin-inhibiting effect in the stomach for oral delivery of semaglutide was advocated. Comparing the two surfactants, we found equivocal evidence for discrete mechanisms at the level of epithelial interactions in the small intestine, especially at the high doses used in vivo. Evidence that one agent is more efficacious compared to the other is not convincing, with tablets containing these PEs inducing single-digit highly variable increases in oral bioavailability of payloads in human trials, although this may be adequate for potent macromolecules. Regarding safety, SNAC has generally regarded as safe (GRAS) status and is Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved as a medical food (Eligen®-Vitamin B12, Emisphere, Roseland, NJ, USA), whereas C10 has a long history of use in man, and has food additive status. Evidence for co-absorption of microorganisms in the presence of either SNAC or C10 has not emerged from clinical trials to date, and long-term effects from repeat dosing beyond six months have yet to be assessed. Since there are no obvious scientific reasons to prefer SNAC over C10 in orally delivering a poorly permeable macromolecule, then formulation, manufacturing, and commercial considerations are the key drivers in decision-making.
Salcaprozate sodium (SNAC) enhances permeability of octreotide across isolated rat and human intestinal epithelial mucosae in Ussing chambers
Eur J Pharm Sci 2020 Nov 1;154:105509.PMID:32777258DOI:10.1016/j.ejps.2020.105509.
Octreotide is approved as a one-month injectable for treatment of acromegaly and neuroendocrine tumours. Oral delivery of the octapeptide is a challenge due mainly to low intestinal epithelial permeability. The intestinal permeation enhancer (PE) Salcaprozate sodium (SNAC) has Generally Regarded As Safe (GRAS) status and is a component of an approved oral peptide formulation. The purpose of the study was to examine the capacity of Salcaprozate sodium (SNAC), to increase its permeability across isolated rat intestinal mucosae from five regions and across human colonic mucosae mounted in Ussing chambers. Apical-side buffers were Kreb's-Henseleit (KH), fasted simulated intestinal fluid (FaSSIF-V2), rat simulated intestinal fluid (rSIF), and colonic simulated intestinal fluid (FaSSCoF). The basal apparent permeability coefficient (Papp) of [3H]-octreotide was equally low across rat intestinal regional mucosae in KH, rSIF, and FaSSIF-V2. Apical addition of 20 mM SNAC increased the Papp across rat tissue in KH: colon (by 3.2-fold) > ileum (3.4-fold) > upper jejunum (2.3-fold) > duodenum (1.4-fold) > stomach (1.4-fold). 20 mM and 40 mM SNAC also increased the Papp by 1.5-fold and 2.1-fold respectively across human colonic mucosae in KH. Transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) values were reduced in the presence in SNAC especially in colonic regions. LC-MS/MS analysis of permeated unlabelled octreotide across human colonic mucosae in the presence of SNAC indicated that [3H]-octreotide remained intact. No gross damage was caused to rat or human mucosae by SNAC. Attenuation of the effects of SNAC was seen in rat jejunal mucosae incubated with FaSSIF-V2 and rSIF, and also to some extent in human colonic mucosae using FaSSCoF, suggesting interaction between SNAC with buffer components. In conclusion, SNAC showed potential as an intestinal permeation enhancer for octreotide, but in vivo efficacy may be attenuated by interactions with GI luminal fluid contents.
Characterization of the physicochemical interactions between exenatide and two intestinal permeation enhancers: Sodium caprate (C10) and Salcaprozate sodium (SNAC)
Int J Pharm 2022 Oct 15;626:122131.PMID:36028084DOI:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122131.
A common approach to tackle the poor intestinal membrane permeability of peptides after oral administration is to formulate them with a permeation enhancer (PE). Increased oral bioavailability for oral peptide candidates has been reported from clinical trials when either Salcaprozate sodium (SNAC) or sodium caprate (C10) is incorporated in the formulation. However, little is known about how they physically interact with peptides in solution. Our objective was to compare the biophysical interactions between the GLP-1 analogue exenatide (Byetta®, Lilly), and C10 or SNAC using a variety of advanced analytical techniques. First, critical micelle concentration was measured in different buffers for both PEs. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements revealed specific supramolecular structures arising from exenatide-PE association. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) indicated the formation of exenatide-PE complexes with a high contribution from non-specific interactions and rapid binding kinetics, resulting in overall low affinities. DLS and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) were used to examine the supramolecular organization of the PEs, and revealed thermodynamic signatures characterized by unfavourable enthalpic contributions compensated by favourable entropic ones, but with low-affinity estimates in water (KD in the 10-100 µM range). With affinity capillary electrophoresis (ACE), weak interactions between exenatide and SNAC or C10 were confirmed in saline, with a dissociation constant around 10 µM and 30 µM respectively. In biorelevant intestinal media, the bile salts in FaSSIF and FeSSIF further reduced the binding of both agents to exenatide (KD ≈ 100 µM), indicating that the interaction between the PEs and exenatide might be inhibited by bile salts in the GI lumen. This study suggests that the interactions of both PEs with exenatide follow a similar non-covalent mechanism and are of low affinity.
The combined effect of permeation enhancement and proteolysis inhibition on the systemic exposure of orally administrated peptides: Salcaprozate sodium, soybean trypsin inhibitor, and teriparatide study in pigs
Int J Pharm X 2021 Oct 8;3:100097.PMID:34704013DOI:10.1016/j.ijpx.2021.100097.
Oral delivery of peptides and proteins is hindered by their rapid proteolysis in the gastrointestinal tract and their inability to permeate biological membranes. Various drug delivery approaches are being investigated and implemented to overcome these obstacles. In the discussed study conducted in pigs, an investigation was undertaken to assess the effect of combination of a permeation enhancer - Salcaprozate sodium, and a proteolysis inhibitor - soybean trypsin inhibitor, on the systemic exposure of the peptide teriparatide, following intraduodenal administration. Results demonstrate that this combination achieves significantly higher Cmax and AUC (~10- and ~20-fold respectively) compared to each of these methodologies on their own. It was thus concluded that an appropriate combination of different technological approaches may considerably contribute to an efficient oral delivery of biological macromolecules.
Subchronic oral toxicity of Salcaprozate sodium (SNAC) in Sprague-Dawley and Wistar rats
Int J Toxicol 2009 Jul-Aug;28(4):278-93.PMID:19636071DOI:10.1177/1091581809337737.
Salcaprozate sodium (SNAC) (sodium 8-((2-hydroxybenzoyl) amino) octanoate, CAS RN 203787-91-1) is classified as an oral absorption promoter, and its potential therapeutic applications as a delivery agent for oral forms of heparin and insulin have been explored in a number of clinical investigations. However, limited information about its nonclinical safety is available in the published scientific literature. As part of a larger study exploring the safety of SNAC in combination with heparin, Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats (20/sex/group) received SNAC alone at 2000 mg/kg/d orally (gavage) for 13 weeks (females were terminated after 10 weeks). In a separate study assessing the safety of SNAC in combination with ibandronate, Wistar rats (10/sex/group) received SNAC alone at levels of 100, 500, or 1000 mg/kg/d orally for 13 weeks. SNAC-related mortality was evident only at the 2000-mg/kg/d level, 20% among males and 50% among females; no clear cause of death was evident. No mortality was seen in the Wistar rat study at doses up to 1000 mg/kg/d. Some differences in clinical pathology parameters, including slightly altered electrolyte levels and lower globulin levels, were seen in SD and Wistar rats. Although these differences reached statistical significance, parameters were within historical control ranges. Liver and kidney weights were slightly higher in SNAC-treated animals of both strains, with no corresponding histopathological changes. These changes may therefore constitute an adaptive response. Histopathological changes were seen in the stomach in both studies, probably secondary to irritation caused by the dosing method. Based on the results of these studies, a no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) cannot be given for SD rats. The NOAEL for SNAC in Wistar rats was considered to be 1000 mg/kg/d.