Tecastemizole
(Synonyms: Norastemizole) 目录号 : GC64545
Tecastemizole (Norastemizole)，Astemizole 的主要代谢物，是一种有效的、选择性的 H1 receptor 拮抗剂。Tecastemizole 具有抗炎活性。
Cas No.:75970-99-9
Sample solution is provided at 25 µL, 10mM.
;)
,-1-7$$$37316672.jpg');)
;)
;)
$$$36806353.jpg');)
;33(7)%EF%BC%9A546-561$$$37156877.jpg');)
;)
;)
;)
%201124-1138.$$$35908550.jpg');)
%20766-780.$$$37100057.jpg');)
%20418-432.$$$36893736.jpg');)
%EF%BC%9A-240-255.$$$35108512.jpg');)
533-545$$$36543525.jpg');)
%201-13.$$$36600053.jpg');)
;)
Quality Control & SDS
- View current batch:
- Purity: >99.00%
- COA (Certificate Of Analysis)
- SDS (Safety Data Sheet)
- Datasheet
Tecastemizole (Norastemizole), a major metabolite of Astemizole, is a potent and selective H1 receptor antagonist. Tecastemizole shows anti-inflammatory activities[1].
[1]. Lever R, et al. Effect of tecastemizole on pulmonary and cutaneous allergic inflammatory responses. Clin Exp Allergy. 2007 Jun;37(6):909-17.
| Cas No. | 75970-99-9 | SDF | Download SDF |
| 别名 | Norastemizole | ||
| 分子式 | C19H21FN4 | 分子量 | 324.4 |
| 溶解度 | DMSO : 100 mg/mL (308.26 mM; ultrasonic and warming and heat to 60°C) | 储存条件 | Store at -20°C |
| General tips | 请根据产品在不同溶剂中的溶解度选择合适的溶剂配制储备液；一旦配成溶液，请分装保存，避免反复冻融造成的产品失效。 储备液的保存方式和期限：-80°C 储存时，请在 6 个月内使用，-20°C 储存时，请在 1 个月内使用。 为了提高溶解度，请将管子加热至37℃，然后在超声波浴中震荡一段时间。 |
||
| Shipping Condition | 评估样品解决方案：配备蓝冰进行发货。所有其他可用尺寸：配备RT，或根据请求配备蓝冰。 | ||
| 制备储备液 | |||
 |
1 mg | 5 mg | 10 mg |
| 1 mM | 3.0826 mL | 15.4131 mL | 30.8261 mL |
| 5 mM | 0.6165 mL | 3.0826 mL | 6.1652 mL |
| 10 mM | 0.3083 mL | 1.5413 mL | 3.0826 mL |
| 第一步：请输入基本实验信息（考虑到实验过程中的损耗，建议多配一只动物的药量） | ||||||||||
| 给药剂量 | mg/kg |  |
动物平均体重 | g | |
每只动物给药体积 | ul | |
动物数量 | 只 |
| 第二步：请输入动物体内配方组成（配方适用于不溶于水的药物；不同批次药物配方比例不同，请联系GLPBIO为您提供正确的澄清溶液配方） | ||||||||||
| % DMSO % % Tween 80 % saline | ||||||||||
| 计算重置 | ||||||||||
计算结果:
工作液浓度： mg/ml；
DMSO母液配制方法： mg 药物溶于 μL DMSO溶液（母液浓度 mg/mL，
体内配方配制方法：取 μL DMSO母液，加入 μL PEG300，混匀澄清后加入μL Tween 80，混匀澄清后加入 μL saline，混匀澄清。
1. 首先保证母液是澄清的；
2.
一定要按照顺序依次将溶剂加入，进行下一步操作之前必须保证上一步操作得到的是澄清的溶液，可采用涡旋、超声或水浴加热等物理方法助溶。
3. 以上所有助溶剂都可在 GlpBio 网站选购。
Effect of Tecastemizole on pulmonary and cutaneous allergic inflammatory responses
Clin Exp Allergy 2007 Jun;37(6):909-17.PMID:17517105DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2222.2007.02730.x.
Background: Tecastemizole, a major metabolite of astemizole, is a potent and selective H1 receptor antagonist. Evidence suggests that this and certain other H1 receptor antagonists may possess anti-inflammatory effects that are, in some cases, independent of H1 receptor antagonism. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the anti-inflammatory effects of tectastemizole in models of allergic inflammation. Methods: Effects of Tecastemizole were assessed in a murine model of allergic lung inflammation, in passive cutaneous anaphylaxis (PCA) responses in guinea-pig skin and in in vitro assays measuring endothelial adhesion molecule expression and leucocyte-endothelial adhesion. Results: Tecastemizole inhibited antigen-induced eosinophil recruitment to the lungs of allergic mice in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, combination of a sub-effective dose of Tecastemizole, combined with a sub-effective dose of dexamethasone inhibited eosinophil accumulation in this model. Plasma extravasation in PCA reactions was inhibited by Tecastemizole, although by a mechanism that would appear to be H1 receptor-dependent. Cytokine-induced endothelial intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expression, as well as mononuclear cell adhesion to human umbilical vein endothelial cells was inhibited by tecastemazole in a manner independent of H1 receptor antagonism. Conclusion: These data suggest that Tecastemizole may have H1 receptor-independent effects in inhibiting late-phase inflammatory responses, while acute responses appear to be inhibited in a H1 receptor-dependent manner. Furthermore, our data suggest an important potential steroid-sparing role for such drugs in the treatment of allergic inflammatory conditions.
Magnetic resonance spectroscopy for measuring the biodistribution and in situ in vivo pharmacokinetics of fluorinated compounds: validation using an investigation of liver and heart disposition of Tecastemizole
J Clin Pharm Ther 2006 Jun;31(3):261-73.PMID:16789992DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2710.2006.00735.x.
Background and objective: The study of biodistribution and in situ pharmacokinetics is a challenging, but sometimes very important, aspect of premarketing characterization of drugs. We aimed to develop a non-invasive fluorine magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopic method for the absolute quantitation of a mono-fluorinated compound and of its metabolites in the heart and liver of healthy subjects for this purpose. Method: We used fluorine MR spectroscopy (MRS) at 4 T (Tesla) and external standardization in an open label multiple-dose study. Twenty-three healthy adult subjects were enrolled in the study. The surface coil localized fluorine MR spectrum was monitored in the heart and liver at baseline and after oral administration of multiple doses of Tecastemizole. Steady-state measurements were made at set time points that depended upon dose, and washout measurements were made only on subjects in which in vivo fluorine signal was observed. Results and discussion: At 4 T, under the given experimental conditions, the method had a lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) of about 2.6 microm and a limit of detection (LOD) of about 0.3 microm for solution state samples (linewidth approximately 15 Hz). The measurement reproducibility was 6.4% using a 50 microm phantom. The effect of MR operator and spectral analyst on the calculated calibration curve slope was small, with inter-rater correlation coefficients of 0.999 and 0.998 respectively. MR signal from fluorine-containing tecastemizole-related moieties was observed in situ only at day 8 in the liver of three of five subjects dosed at 270 mg/day. The average in situ concentration was estimated to be 58+/-22 microm, with an average test-retest reproducibility of 216%. Extrapolating the in vitro results to human measurements, with an approximate linewidth of 250 Hz, predicts in situ LOD and LLOQ values of approximately 6 and 44 microm respectively. However, the human study had a fluorine MRS LOD of approximately 20 microm. The decrease in sensitivity and the increase in variability of the in vivo, in situ measurements compared with the validation study most likely arose from coil placement and incomplete rephasing of the MR signal by the respiratory phase compensation method. Conclusion: The measured concentrations were the lowest ever recorded for a multi-dose exogenous mono-fluorinated compound in the human liver using a validated fluorine MR quantitation method. The proposed non-invasive MR method for studying the biodistribution and in situ pharmacokinetics of mono-fluorinated compounds in the liver and heart should have broader application to the development of non-invasive biomarkers.