Tenofovir amibufenamide
(Synonyms: 艾米替诺福韦,HS-10234) 目录号 : GC64918
Tenofovir amibufenamide (HS-10234) 是一种 Tenofovir 前药，是一种具有口服活性的抗病毒剂。Tenofovir amibufenamide 抑制乙型肝炎病毒 (HBV)，可用于慢性乙型肝炎 (CHB) 研究。
Cas No.:1571076-26-0
Sample solution is provided at 25 µL, 10mM.
;)
,-1-7$$$37316672.jpg');)
;)
;)
$$$36806353.jpg');)
;33(7)%EF%BC%9A546-561$$$37156877.jpg');)
;)
;)
;)
%201124-1138.$$$35908550.jpg');)
%20766-780.$$$37100057.jpg');)
%20418-432.$$$36893736.jpg');)
%EF%BC%9A-240-255.$$$35108512.jpg');)
533-545$$$36543525.jpg');)
%201-13.$$$36600053.jpg');)
;)
Quality Control & SDS
- View current batch:
- Purity: >99.50%
- COA (Certificate Of Analysis)
- SDS (Safety Data Sheet)
- Datasheet
Tenofovir amibufenamide (HS-10234), a Tenofovir prodrug, is an orally active antiviral agent. Tenofovir amibufenamide inhibits HBV, and can be used for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) study[1][2].
[1]. Zhihong Liu, et al. Randomised clinical trial: 48 weeks of treatment with tenofovir amibufenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for patients with chronic hepatitis B. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Nov;54(9):1134-1149.
[2]. Hong Zhang, et al. Randomised clinical trial: safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of HS-10234 versus tenofovir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jan;53(2):243-252.
| Cas No. | 1571076-26-0 | SDF | Download SDF |
| 别名 | 艾米替诺福韦,HS-10234 | ||
| 分子式 | C22H31N6O5P | 分子量 | 490.49 |
| 溶解度 | DMSO : 200 mg/mL (407.76 mM; Need ultrasonic) | 储存条件 | Store at -20°C |
| General tips | 请根据产品在不同溶剂中的溶解度选择合适的溶剂配制储备液；一旦配成溶液，请分装保存，避免反复冻融造成的产品失效。 储备液的保存方式和期限：-80°C 储存时，请在 6 个月内使用，-20°C 储存时，请在 1 个月内使用。 为了提高溶解度，请将管子加热至37℃，然后在超声波浴中震荡一段时间。 |
||
| Shipping Condition | 评估样品解决方案：配备蓝冰进行发货。所有其他可用尺寸：配备RT，或根据请求配备蓝冰。 | ||
| 制备储备液 | |||
 |
1 mg | 5 mg | 10 mg |
| 1 mM | 2.0388 mL | 10.1939 mL | 20.3878 mL |
| 5 mM | 0.4078 mL | 2.0388 mL | 4.0776 mL |
| 10 mM | 0.2039 mL | 1.0194 mL | 2.0388 mL |
| 第一步：请输入基本实验信息（考虑到实验过程中的损耗，建议多配一只动物的药量） | ||||||||||
| 给药剂量 | mg/kg |  |
动物平均体重 | g | |
每只动物给药体积 | ul | |
动物数量 | 只 |
| 第二步：请输入动物体内配方组成（配方适用于不溶于水的药物；不同批次药物配方比例不同，请联系GLPBIO为您提供正确的澄清溶液配方） | ||||||||||
| % DMSO % % Tween 80 % saline | ||||||||||
| 计算重置 | ||||||||||
计算结果:
工作液浓度： mg/ml；
DMSO母液配制方法： mg 药物溶于 μL DMSO溶液（母液浓度 mg/mL，
体内配方配制方法：取 μL DMSO母液，加入 μL PEG300，混匀澄清后加入μL Tween 80，混匀澄清后加入 μL saline，混匀澄清。
1. 首先保证母液是澄清的；
2.
一定要按照顺序依次将溶剂加入，进行下一步操作之前必须保证上一步操作得到的是澄清的溶液，可采用涡旋、超声或水浴加热等物理方法助溶。
3. 以上所有助溶剂都可在 GlpBio 网站选购。
96-Week Treatment of Tenofovir amibufenamide and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients
J Clin Transl Hepatol 2023 Jun 28;11(3):649-660.PMID:36969889DOI:10.14218/JCTH.2022.00058.
Background and aims: Tenofovir amibufenamide (TMF) is a novel phosphoramidated prodrug of tenofovir with noninferior efficacy and better bone and renal safety to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in 48 weeks of treatment. Here, we update 96-week comparison results. Methods: Patients with chronic hepatitis B were assigned (2:1) to receive either 25 mg TMF or 300 mg TDF with matching placebo for 96 weeks. The virological suppression was defined as HBV DNA levels <20 IU/mL at week 96. Safety was evaluated thoroughly with focusing on bone, renal, and metabolic parameters. Results: Virological suppression rates at week 96 were similar between TMF and TDF group in both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative populations. Noninferior efficacy was maintained in the pooled population, while it was first achieved in patients with HBV DNA ≥7 or 8 log10 IU/mL at baseline. Non-indexed estimated glomerular filtration rate for renal safety assessment was adopted, while a smaller decline of which was seen in the TMF group than in the TDF group (p=0.01). For bone mineral density, patients receiving TMF displayed significantly lower reduction levels in the densities of spine, hip, and femur neck at week 96 than those receiving TDF. In addition, the lipid parameters were stable after week 48 in all groups while weight change still showed the opposite trend. Conclusions: TMF maintained similar efficacy at week 96 compared with TDF with continued superior bone and renal safety profiles (NCT03903796).
Randomised clinical trial: 48 weeks of treatment with Tenofovir amibufenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for patients with chronic hepatitis B
Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2021 Nov;54(9):1134-1149.PMID:34587302DOI:10.1111/apt.16611.
Background: Tenofovir amibufenamide (TMF) can provide more efficient delivery than tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of TMF and TDF for 48 weeks in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Methods: We performed a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority study at 49 sites in China. Patients with CHB were assigned (2:1) to receive either 25 mg TMF or 300 mg TDF with matching placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA less than 20 IU/mL at week 48. We also assessed safety, particularly bone, renal and metabolic abnormalities. Results: We randomised 1002 eligible patients. The baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups. After a median 48 weeks of treatment, the non-inferiority criterion was met in all analysis sets. In the HBeAg-positive population, 50.2% of patients receiving TMF and 53.7% receiving TDF achieved HBV DNA less than 20 IU/mL. In the HBeAg-negative population, 88.9% and 87.8%, respectively, achieved HBV DNA less than 20 IU/mL in the TMF and TDF groups. Patients receiving TMF had significantly less decrease in bone mineral density at both hip (P < 0.001) and spine (P < 0.001), and a smaller increase in serum creatinine at week 48 (P < 0.05). Other safety results were similar between groups. Conclusion: TMF was non-inferior to TDF in terms of anti-HBV efficacy and showed better bone and renal safety. (NCT03903796).
Improved pharmacokinetics of tenofovir ester prodrugs strengthened the inhibition of HBV replication and the rebalance of hepatocellular metabolism in preclinical models
Front Pharmacol 2022 Aug 29;13:932934.PMID:36105197DOI:10.3389/fphar.2022.932934.
Tenofovir (TFV) ester prodrugs, a class of nucleotide analogs (NAs), are the first-line clinical anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) drugs with potent antiviral efficacy, low resistance rate and high safety. In this work, three marketed TFV ester drugs, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) and Tenofovir amibufenamide fumarate (TMF), were used as probes to investigate the relationships among prodrug structures, pharmacokinetic characteristics, metabolic activations, pharmacological responses and to reveal the key factors of TFV ester prodrug design. The results indicated that TMF and TAF exhibited significantly stronger inhibition of HBV DNA replication than did TDF in HBV-positive HepG2.2.15 cells. The anti-HBV activity of TMF was slightly stronger than TAF after 9 days of treatment (EC50 7.29 ± 0.71 nM vs. 12.17 ± 0.56 nM). Similar results were observed in the HBV decline period post drug administration to the HBV transgenic mouse model, although these three TFV prodrugs finally achieved the same anti-HBV effect after 42 days treatments. Furthermore, TFV ester prodrugs showed a correcting effect on disordered host hepatic biochemical metabolism, including TCA cycle, glycolysis, pentose phosphate pathway, purine/pyrimidine metabolism, amino acid metabolism, ketone body metabolism and phospholipid metabolism. The callback effects of the three TFV ester prodrugs were ranked as TMF > TAF > TDF. These advantages of TMF were believed to be attributed to its greater bioavailability in preclinical animals (SD rats, C57BL/6 mice and beagle dogs) and better target loading, especially in terms of the higher hepatic level of the pharmacologically active metabolite TFV-DP, which was tightly related to anti-HBV efficacy. Further analysis indicated that stability in intestinal fluid determined the actual amount of TFV prodrug at the absorption site, and hepatic/intestinal stability determined the maintenance amount of prodrug in circulation, both of which influenced the oral bioavailability of TFV prodrugs. In conclusion, our research revealed that improved pharmacokinetics of TFV ester prodrugs (especially intestinal stability) strengthened the inhibition of HBV replication and the rebalance of hepatocellular metabolism, which provides new insights and a basis for the design, modification and evaluation of new TFV prodrugs in the future.